PDA

View Full Version : Stagg information


nor02lei
08-10-2008, 10:48
As we have a Stagg vertical on our next BBB tasting event now on Saturday I have tried to find the different fact sheets that I did not already have, here on the forum. I can’t find the 2002 and 2003 though. Is there anyone that can help me out in this matter?
Another thing that have puzzled me for several years are the rebarrelling of the spring 2005 version. I have had these 2 side by side and there is a significant difference in taste. I know from reading this forum, that lot B was rebarrelled for a relatively short time, but not exactly how short I did mail the question of this to BT and got this answer from Kris Comstock: “Just a few days”. I am glad for any comment on that as well and all other not well-known Stagg information of cause.

Leif

barturtle
08-10-2008, 11:02
Leif,

That would be a very interesting vertical to attend. Do you have all the various bottlings?

Unfortunately I am not aware of the 2002 or 2003 ever having been posted, and while I do have a copy of the 2001 Eagle Rare 17, I never managed to obtain them for the bottles you are looking for.

Have you asked Mr. Comstock, if they happen to be able to email you a copy from BT's files?

TNbourbon
08-10-2008, 12:14
Leif, I have the 2003 insert from a 3-bottle case of Stagg, but it is blank on the back, with the standard "Dear Friend of Buffalo Trace" letter on the front. My inference from that is that BT didn't start posting the particulars on the back of that insert until 2004, on which I find them.

nor02lei
08-10-2008, 12:35
Leif,

That would be a very interesting vertical to attend. Do you have all the various bottlings??
All except the 2002 Thimothy.


Have you asked Mr. Comstock, if they happen to be able to email you a copy from BT's files?
He could only find 2005 and newer.

nor02lei
08-10-2008, 12:37
Leif, I have the 2003 insert from a 3-bottle case of Stagg, but it is blank on the back, with the standard "Dear Friend of Buffalo Trace" letter on the front. My inference from that is that BT didn't start posting the particulars on the back of that insert until 2004, on which I find them.
I was afraid of that Tim.
Leif