Printable View
I know exactly what you mean, and it probably is no big deal, but "blend" is maybe not the best way to state it. Nasty connotations to it. "Marrying", or "Mingling", might be better.Quote:
Originally Posted by soonami
I will now go away and try to pull the string out of my arse...:D
The barrels are sourced from LDI, but I reckon they are not necesarily distilled at LDI ?
When I visited Smooth Ambler I had a walk in the warehouse, when I came back home to Denmark I saw a cask end with DSP KY 8, when going through my photos. This is Four Roses and both companies were at one time owned by Seagrams.
I should have payed more attention to the casks when I was there, instead of when examing my holiday photos. It was an extremely hot day and it was after the June storm so the whole area was out of power. I tried some 14, 19 and 21 yo samples, especially the 19yo was very woody and dry, the 14yo was less and more fruity and you can balance it out by mixing them together :-)
So if you like old woody dry whiskies, almost to the extent of the whiskey richocheting back of your tongue, this is surely something for you
I got a bottle of the yearling as well, and this is probably the best whisky under 3 years I have ever tasted. Still young and youthful, but quite drinkable and moreish as well, and the wheater character really emerges very well - I am not the fan of young whiskies but this bottle has grown legs in my house and started walking :-)
Attachment 14430
Steffen
PS a few years ago the term "vatting" was used in Scotland for mixing casks after your own wishing, but they want everybody to use the term "blending" today (When is come to scotch whisky). Not sure how happy some (a lot) is about this term, and I understand why it is also opposed used in coinnection with bourbons as it can associate to a catragory named "blends" which is another thing. I don't know what your prefered term is, mingling and mixing are good ones, my prefered term is vatting, but that is because I started out as a scotch drinker
Thanks for the info. I purchased a bottle of the 19yr today. Looking forward to how it taste.
Well, don't, because in whiskey, 'blend' is a term of art with a very specific meaning that goes beyond the dictionary meaning. A 'blend' is a combination of two or more whiskeys of different types, or (in American usage) of whiskey and neutral spirit. If you use the word 'blend' to a straight whiskey maker, he is likely to take offense. Especially in American whiskey, blends are considered drek and to use the term in reference to a straight is an insult. Words have consequences. Learn something. If you're talking about a combination or mixture of straight whiskeys of the same type, then use 'combination' or 'mixture' or 'mingling' or something else, but don't use 'blend.' You just confuse your reader and make yourself look ignorant.Quote:
Originally Posted by soonami
Bonds can also contain component whiskies of different ages. The requirement is for the same distilling season, not the same age.Quote:
Originally Posted by HighInTheMtns
Makes sense now that I think it through, thanks for the clarification.Quote:
Originally Posted by callmeox
And thank you for not making me type out an explanation. :grin:Quote:
Originally Posted by HighInTheMtns
About 2-3 months ago I bought a similarly aged LDI bourbon (James Pepper 15 year old) and it is wretched. Super thin, medicinal, lots of burning.
Last month I was in NY and a liquor store had Smooth Ambler, all different years including the 14/15 and the 19. I was intrigued but passed based on my experience with James Pepper.
Just to be clear, with a bond the difference in age is minimal, i.e., less than 6 months.Quote:
Originally Posted by callmeox
No need to be a jerk about it. I know perfectly well what the legal definition of a "blend" is. You don't have to write a book about Bourbon to be knowledgable in the subject. I simply "misspoke" and let the wrong term slip, as one is wont to do if they have a background in another field. I apologize and will strive to never offend you and distillers ever againQuote:
Originally Posted by cowdery