Originally Posted by
cowdery
I've exchanged some notes with Reggie Amos, the guy behind this. He told me right off that it's LDI bourbon. He wrote: "The bourbon has been distilled by LDI ( we believe one of the best distilleries in the US). We are not going to hide the fact that LDI makes our bourbon as we are proud of that fact and do want to mislead our consumers in any way. We have labeled the bourbon barrel proof as it will be bottled at 113.3 proof and although we have not included an age statement the bourbon is in fact 4 years old. The mash bill contains 20% rye and we believe this is very good profile for the bourbon as it has a very clean, crisp flavor."
I asked him why they eschewed the word 'straight.' His reply: "We thought long and hard about using the term Straight and decided that the term technically only means the bourbon is over 2 years old. Because we wanted our brand to be modern (a bit minimal) we also were very specific in the message on the bottle and since we want to promote the fact that our bourbon is higher proof (as close as we can get to going from the barrel to the bottle) we decided to put the idea of barrel proof on the bottle."
I have not tasted it but am somewhat curious to, since I'm not sure I've yet tasted a 4-year-old bourbon from MGPI Indiana that doesn't have some kind of finish.
Of course, I usually get to try these things without paying for them. If the suggested retail on this is $50, I just can't see that. I'm reminded of Heaven Hill's recent Red State/Blue State. It was a gimmick for the election, the labels were very cheap, and they sold it for $12 a bottle. The whiskey was maybe not quite even Evan Williams black label quality, but it was perfectly drinkable and I drank quite a bit of it. When you can get bourbon for $12 that's as good or better than bourbon that's selling for $50 a bottle, there's no reason to buy the $50 bottle unless you simply don't know any better.
Here at SB.com, we know better.