Re: George Dickel shortage
If you are in Florida, you should be able to find the new Dickle Cascade Hollow release. It is 3 years old and has been released to fill the gap until more #8 hits the market. Try an ABC liquor store if there is one in your area!
Thomas
Re: George Dickel shortage
Howdy,
I bunkered away a 5th of Dickels 12 yr old last Summer. I found two bottles in "the 'hood" here in Shreveport after reading about how rare it was becoming.
I drank one and wasn't terribly impressed. The remaining unopened bottle sits in a cabinet collecting dust.
Eggman
Re: George Dickel shortage
We've talked about this in a couple of previous threads, one of which is here.
Re: George Dickel shortage
Eggman- I don't care for #12 either. One can do better. However #8 is another story. Give it a try if you get a chance.
-Rick
Re: George Dickel shortage
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ricksaunders
Eggman- I don't care for #12 either. One can do better. However #8 is another story. Give it a try if you get a chance.
-Rick
When Dickel makes whisky...it is all Dickel whisky. There is no difference between 8 and 12 when it comes off the still. IIRC, the only difference is the proof and maybe a little age.
While in Houston this weekend, I saw plenty of Dickel. If there is a shortage...it was not apparent.
Re: George Dickel shortage
Yeah, there's still a lot of Dickel here in Houston.
All I've ever tried was the #12 and the two bottles of it that I have are older bottlings (one of them tax-stripped), so maybe their taste (which I thought was pretty darned good) may not be very representative of current offerings.
Re: George Dickel shortage
Sam's has #12 and Binny's has #12 and Barrel Select on their websites.
Re: George Dickel shortage
Saw plenty of #12 in Austin this last weekend. The clerk said it had been on the shelf without fail. No #8 to be seen.
Re: George Dickel shortage
The #12 has been in steady production. It is older, thus the available whiskey -- the distillation hiatus began in 1999, nine years ago -- matches its profile, though even it is getting long in the tooth.
The problem originated when the available whiskey for both the #8 -- which usually is 4-5 years old -- and the #12 was the same whiskey. In c. 2005, the last whiskey distilled was of an appropriate age for both bottlings (actually, a bit old for #8, but they didn't have anything younger). Thus, distilling had re-ignited, but did no good, marketing-wise, for 3 years.
Heck, you figure it out -- if you're bottling the same whiskey for the #8 and the higher-priced #12, which one are you going to continue?
Alas, my experience with the new distillate isn't up to par. Let's hope that John Lunn (who I covered as a high-school footballer) gets up to speed.