I enthusiastically agree with what has been stated about ratings. Everybody's palate is different. SMOWK's baffling dislike of 4R is a good example.![]()
It's a rookie mistake to assume that high age always equals high quality. The rye version of Vintage 17, ER 17, Pappys 20 & 23, 4R 100th anniversary 17 y/o are all among the most disappointing and dull whiskeys I have ever tasted. Don't get me wrong, I'm a fan of age statements, but one of the great things about bourbon is that there are some very tasty options at single digit ages and in the NAS category.
Sky... now I know you are a closet 4R drinker and to some degree coming around to some of their more interesting offerings....![]()
As for why people care about what others like.... well 90% (my estimate) of folks fail to trust themselves and prefer others tell them what they should like.....
"The most futile and disastrous day seems well spent when it is reviewed through the blue, fragrant smoke of a Havana Cigar"
Anyone tried more recent distillery-only bottlings? Last month they had barrels 5 through 7 bottled.
Josh, Make no mistake, it's not that I dislike 4R, I just find it is at or near the bottom of my ranking of distilleries. It is still a head and shoulders above any non-bourbon distilleries in the world. I like age, the older the better, and 4R just doesn't offer much in this realm. The ones that are "old", just don't taste like it. I have yet to find a bourbon that was too old, yet I shall keep trying.
Reid, I keep trying and buying. Being an IT guy, I spend a lot of time in closets and under women's desks. I love me some cougar bourbon.