I suspect they can't just leave things alone because they have to accept the whisky as the maker sees fit to prepare it for sale.
I suspect they can't just leave things alone because they have to accept the whisky as the maker sees fit to prepare it for sale.
It was - but no one seemed to have any insight into the KY link, other than the change in label on the Jefferson's Rye bottle. Thought I would ask to see if anyone had any new info.
A worthwhile topic to be brought up again. If we stopped at one discussion per subject this place would close.
"To deny our own impulses is to deny the very thing that makes us human."
Larry Wachowski
Datum duely noted, TyvM.
There's plenty of motive as to why you would lie about the source of a whiskey. Just the tip of the iceburg, Ryes, specifically American Straight Ryes, are making a comeback. If it says made in canada, how many people will think it's a canadian whiskey? They want this labelled as a rye. Why wouldn't they lie about this, if they can get away with it? The Zoellers seem to be more than marginally worse at confounding the facts than say, Drew at KBD, and that's impressive. As far as rectifiers go, only Perkins from High West seems to be relatively honest and has actually stated exactly where some of his whiskey has come from, and Preston Van Winkle doesn't seem to intentionally side track the facts a ton (there's some mis-info there but not a lot), and has been mostly up-front with where current PVW sources are from.
There's no shortage of tall tales in the whisky industry but I don't buy hype.