Welcome to the Straightbourbon.com Forums.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Wheaters

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Disciple
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,523

    Wheaters

    I'd love to see this thread become a roundtable for our thoughts on Wheaters. Many of us love them, some are indifferent, and some hate.

    The main reason I started this thread was the mouthfeel difference I get from HH Wheaters vs. all others. I was tasting Larceny, and it had the high-toned spice notes that I get from all HH products. Regardless of mashbill, HH never gives me the fatter mouthfeel I get from certain products, except for the occasional rare product like PHC Wheater.

    After the Larceny, I revisited current Old Fitz 12, and got the same profile. Then I went to Weller 12 and MM, and there I got that fat, buttery mouthfeel I associate with Wheaters.

    Josh's Tree(Which should be a sticky!) lists MM as 70/16/14. Further down the tree he says that Bernheim wheater was listed as 75/20/5. As I understand it, Samuels got both the recipe AND yeast from Pappy. I assume BT is using the same recipe as S-W, but what about yeast? As for HH, I was also under the assumption that they also got the same mashbill that Old Fitz had always been, but what about yeast?

    The reason I raise these questions is why the variation in mouthfeel between HH Wheaters, and all others? Is it a question of the house style or recipe? Maybe the Beam boys simply blend to a different profile, and have never felt comfortable with the classic Wheater taste? Yet they made the PHC Wheater, which was extraordinary.

    Let's discuss, if anyone cares to.

  2. #2
    Virtuoso
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Twin Cities, MN
    Posts
    1,294

    Re: Wheaters

    I think the PHC, while extraordinary, is still well within the HH wheater profile, just better. Imagine, if you will, what a 10 year old cask strength Maker's would be like. We already have WLW for comparison from the BT line.

    I also taste a lot of similarities between the HH wheaters and their rye recipe bourbons...the mouthfeel is consistent across the board, I think.
    Life's too short, and there's too much good whiskey within reach.

  3. #3
    Disciple
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    A pretty great state.
    Posts
    1,523

    Re: Wheaters

    A few observations...

    The mashbill for HH wheater seems to be in question as of the latest version of the tree (http://www.straightbourbon.com/forum...l=1#post285944) but 5% barley would be extraordinarily low and my money would be against it being so - that's not much more than the bare minimum to convert all the starches in the mash. If 5% barley is truly the case, this could explain some of the difference in mouth feel (see: single malts with thick mouthfeels even at lower proofs.)

    BT enters their wheater into the barrel at 114 proof. Don't know whether HH does the same, but I think this is probably one of the biggest influences on mouthfeel. People who have had a lot of dusties talk about the same sort of mouthfeel in older bottles - from the time when entry proofs were lower.

    I feel like I can be pretty confident in saying that HH is using the same yeast for their wheater as for everything else - Larceny has a very noticeable HH yeast character. I bet BT does the same. I'm sure there's someone here who can tell us that for sure.
    Last edited by HighInTheMtns; 11-27-2012 at 20:19.
    Jim

  4. #4
    Connoisseur
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    downtown DC
    Posts
    695

    Re: Wheaters

    Quote Originally Posted by HighInTheMtns View Post
    A few observations...

    The mashbill for HH wheater seems to be in question as of the latest version of the tree (http://www.straightbourbon.com/forum...l=1#post285944) but 5% barley would be extraordinarily low and my money would be against it being so - that's not much more than the bare minimum to convert all the starches in the mash. If 5% barley is truly the case, this could explain some of the difference in mouth feel (see: single malts with thick mouthfeels even at lower proofs.)

    BT enters their wheater into the barrel at 114 proof. Don't know whether HH does the same, but I think this is probably one of the biggest influences on mouthfeel. People who have had a lot of dusties talk about the same sort of mouthfeel in older bottles - from the time when entry proofs were lower.

    I feel like I can be pretty confident in saying that HH is using the same yeast for their wheater as for everything else - Larceny has a very noticeable HH yeast character. I bet BT does the same. I'm sure there's someone here who can tell us that for sure.

    I heard from another SB.com member that HH distills the white dog for their bourbon almost to the alcohol % limit of what is allowed. I dunno if they do that with their wheaters, but it fits.

  5. #5
    Disciple
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,523

    Re: Wheaters

    Quote Originally Posted by bad_scientist View Post
    I heard from another SB.com member that HH distills the white dog for their bourbon almost to the alcohol % limit of what is allowed. I dunno if they do that with their wheaters, but it fits.
    Yikes. Well that would explain the mouthfeel of HH.

  6. #6
    Guru
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Jackson, MS
    Posts
    10,606

    Re: Wheaters

    However they do it is fine with me so long as they keep producing good whisky at a good price.

  7. #7
    Disciple
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Chicagoland, Illinois
    Posts
    1,538

    Re: Wheaters

    Parker Beam related to Mike Veach back in 2006, as detailed in a thread on BE, that he likes high proof whiskey coming out of the barrel and 125 is the proof it enters the barrel. As to distilling proof at HH, I seem to recall hearing 138 proof but that is a vague memory. Jim Rutledge has mentioned that only one major distiller does distill out at close to 160 proof and by process of elimination I'll assume that is Woodford and not HH.
    Thad

    BTOTY-2011

  8. #8

    Re: Wheaters

    Woodford/Brown Forman distill somewhere in the 158-159 proof range, if I remember correctly.

  9. #9
    Connoisseur
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    916

    Re: Wheaters

    5% malt will convert all of the strach, if not in the cooker, then in the fermenter. I did not look at the new mashbill on the tree. But it i my experience that if you lower the corn content you get less of that fat mouthfeel.

  10. #10
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    405

    Re: Wheaters

    I didn't find the Larceny profile to be much different than the PHC wheater. I thought it tasted like the PHC blendend with some younger barrels and some water, which in my opinion, didn't hurt the flavor, but it brought down the price. If you only want to drink 10yr old Bourbon that's barrel proof, be my guest, but it won't be easy these days... come to think of it, I have at least 7 bottles in my collection out of about 25 that fit that description. Shows what I know.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Wheaters vs. Rye
    By Graal in forum New to Straightbourbon
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-11-2012, 03:12
  2. New Heaven Hill wheaters on the way?
    By bad_scientist in forum General Bourbon Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 02-03-2012, 17:42
  3. Mid-level wheaters
    By clingman71 in forum General Bourbon Discussion
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 10-24-2011, 17:00
  4. Wheaters
    By skeebs0615 in forum General Bourbon Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-12-2008, 14:03

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top