Welcome to the Straightbourbon.com Forums.
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 36 of 36
  1. #31
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    O'Fallon, MO
    Posts
    281

    Re: Botm 1/13: Old Forester Signature

    My OF Signature is 100 proof with screw cap, but does'nt say BIB anywhere. Is this an odd bottling, or are your Signatures 100 proof, too? I'm just now comparing it to EW Black, which is a third less money, and not a third less flavor. This OF Signature is salty, almost overpoweringly so. The nose has just a wiff of detergent, like a laundromat smell, weird. The bottle is half empty, been open since before Christmas, but I don't remember this smell, or the saltiness. Maybe it's just me tonight, but don't get either one from the EW Black. I don't think I'd buy it again, even for $17, much less $22.

  2. #32
    Guru
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Jackson, MS
    Posts
    5,735

    Re: Botm 1/13: Old Forester Signature

    Old Forester has dropped the BIB designation and renamed it Signature, but it's still 100 proof.

  3. #33
    Taster
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Bossier City, La.
    Posts
    76

    Re: Botm 1/13: Old Forester Signature

    Howdy,

    Recently discovered this delightful, middle shelf Bourbon and I'm digging it as a daily pour. I like it better than JB Black label or WT101, although the former is a solid Bourbon as well. If there's a better bang-for- the buck Bourbon, please post it!

  4. #34
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Toledo, OH
    Posts
    408

    Re: Botm 1/13: Old Forester Signature

    Quote Originally Posted by squire View Post
    Old Forester has dropped the BIB designation and renamed it Signature, but it's still 100 proof.
    As usual, The Squire nails it. But more than 100 proof is required by the BIB Act. The whiskey must also be the product of a single distillery made during a single distillation season and spend at least four years in a federally bonded rickhouse. Signature is still 100 proof but, evidently, it does not meet one or more of the other criteria.
    I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.

  5. #35
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Suburbs of Houston, Texas
    Posts
    348

    Re: Botm 1/13: Old Forester Signature

    Quote Originally Posted by Flyfish View Post
    As usual, The Squire nails it. But more than 100 proof is required by the BIB Act. The whiskey must also be the product of a single distillery made during a single distillation season and spend at least four years in a federally bonded rickhouse. Signature is still 100 proof but, evidently, it does not meet one or more of the other criteria.
    I can't get this here in Texas. I hope to try it someday.

  6. #36
    Connoisseur
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    767

    Re: Botm 1/13: Old Forester Signature

    Quote Originally Posted by weller_tex View Post
    I can't get this here in Texas. I hope to try it someday.
    It's certainly not at most stores around here, but I'm pretty sure that I saw a bottle of it somewhere within the last few months. If I remember correctly I passed on it because it was a 1.75 and I didn't want to buy that much.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Old Forester BIB vs. Signature
    By mosugoji64 in forum General Bourbon Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-14-2011, 09:07
  2. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 04-24-2011, 08:49
  3. Old Forester Signature: getting even better?
    By Josh in forum General Bourbon Discussion
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 08-01-2009, 12:58
  4. Newly announced: Old Forester Signature
    By Sijan in forum General Bourbon Discussion
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 11-15-2007, 16:48

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top