I will say, after reading Dale's post, I was the first person to mention it on the fb Maker's Ambassador's Group Page. I then spent a lot of time rallying the troops, there as well as on Maker's business page and several other places around fb, twitter, etc.
In all honesty, Maker's themselves had long before organized the troops, through their Ambassadors Program, but probably never foresaw their own troops being used against them.
2010 Bourbonian of the Year
As long as you have good whiskey you're not "unemployed", you're "Funemployed!!!"
I'm no Pappyophile
2010 Bourbonian of the Year
As long as you have good whiskey you're not "unemployed", you're "Funemployed!!!"
I'm no Pappyophile
Re: the "instant collectible" talk around the 84 proof, Binny's just sent out an email extolling us to get it while we can....
"Delicious... bourbon. Brownest of the brown liquors... so tempting. What's that? You want me to drink you?" -Lionel Hutz
Frankly, I'm not surprised.
Too bad they didn't use pink wax (diluted from their copy-protected red) - then it would REALLY qualify as a collector's item.
Anyone ready to close this thread yet?![]()
Last edited by MauiSon; 02-21-2013 at 15:21.
Nah, let's see how long it lasts.
Changing the stated proof of the spirit to reflect the contents in the bottle doesn't require a new COLA.
There's a list of allowable changes to an approved label (artwork, colors, fonts, contents, etc.) at the TTB:
http://www.ttb.gov/labeling/allowable_revisions.shtml