Welcome to the Straightbourbon.com Forums.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18
  1. #1
    Bourbonian of the Year 2002 and Guru
    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    12,389

    Canadians I\'d like to taste.

    One characteristic of Canadian whisky that distinguishes it from Bourbon is the practice of blending.

    Blending is done by taking a "base" whisky which will form the bulk of the blend and improving it through the addition of small amounts of blending stock. It is this blending stock that I wish someone would release. There have to be some pretty flavorful whiskies in there. Of course, this exactly describes the situation in scotch whiskey before the first single malts came on the market. One would think someone in Canada would see the connection and figure out that it might be a good business proposition to release some Canadian "singles."

    Why haven't they? Maybe the whiskies really suck. I can't think of another explanation.

  2. #2
    Guru
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    SI, NY
    Posts
    2,083

    Re: Canadians I\'d like to taste.

    The only Canadian whiskey I have tried and actually liked was the Hirsch Selection Single Cask Canadian Whiskey which was 12 years old and 106.2 proof. As I remember it, it was very smooth and had a nice flavor profile that I actually enjoyed drinking...

  3. #3
    Bourbonian of the Year 2011
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    8,982

    Re: Canadians I\'d like to taste.

    Lot 40 is the single example, Chuck. It is used by Allied Domecq, I understand, to flavour their CC whisky. AD also uses an unmalted rye whiskey in CC - Lot 40 is all-malted rye to my knowledge - so far unreleased as a separate unit.

    The flavouring whiskies include malt/barley whiskies (likely Irish-type), corn whiskies (likely Bourbon-type) and the aforesaid rye whiskies.

    They don't release them separately, in my view, not because they aren't good, but simply the tradition of selling straight whisky here has long been lost. Still, Lot 40 was a rare foray into the field - too bad it is a relatively indifferent whisky.

    Gary

  4. #4
    Connoisseur
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Bloomington, IN
    Posts
    784

    Re: Canadians I\'d like to taste.

    I've not studied Canadian mashbills at all and Lot 40 is the only one I have. (Of course I've tasted Windsor and CC in the past.)

    My Dad insists he was told when he became diabetic that if he drank any whiskey he should drink Canadian because the primary grain was wheat, not corn. I told him I could not believe that. So... what's the mashbill?

    Greg

  5. #5
    Bourbonian of the Year 2011
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    8,982

    Re: Canadians I\'d like to taste.

    Well, it varies. Whisky in Alberta is made from rye, unmalted rye which is converted by addition of enzymes. It is distilled to a very high proof, around 94% abv., but intentionally is left to have some residual flavour. As far as I know, the flavouring whiskies (straight-type) used in Eastern Canada are dispensed with in Alberta - maybe I am wrong. In the East, cooked corn is the main grain used for the mash and either enzyme addition or barley malt is used to convert it. Wheat can be used in whole or in part to form the mash for the base. The important thing though is not the grain used to make the base whisky, but rather the flavouring whiskies used - where they are used. Anyone can make an approximation of Canadian whisky - take a good Polish rye vodka, and then add 10% each of Lot 40 and Pikesville Supreme Straight Rye Whiskey. The Canadians blend much more than that to make a single brand (both as to the base and flavouring whiskies), and their base whisky (as in Scotland) is aged to a tinted spirit, but the idea is the same.

  6. #6
    Bourbonian of the Year 2002 and Guru
    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    12,389

    Re: Canadians I\'d like to taste.

    Interestingly graphic representation but a good illustration.

    Put another way, a blend is bad whiskey made palatable through the addition of some good whiskey.

    The point, though, in answer to the question is that there is no "mashbill" in the sense that we normally understand it. Instead they make a wheat whiskey, they make a rye whiskey, they make a malt/barley whiskey, they make a corn whiskey. They make and age them separately, then blend them for bottling.

    Although I don't know this to be the case, I am extrapolating from what I do know and guessing that in the West the blending stock is older examples of the same whiskey, while in the East the blending stock might be one or several different kinds of whiskey (i.e., wheat, rye, malt, etc.)

  7. #7
    Bourbonian of the Year 2011
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    8,982

    Re: Canadians I\'d like to taste.

    There is no mashbill as such because different grains, as in Scotland, can be used to make the base whisky in Canada. Most often corn is used, again as in Scotland for its grain whisky. It does not matter really what grain is used (as long as it is grain, not molasses or potatos), because the whisky made - I am talking about the base - is distilled to about 95% abv. That whisky is aged for years and blended with other aged whiskies to get some complexity. The flavouring whiskies added in the East, at least, to such aged blended grain whisky are, in contrast, single grain whiskies (except perhaps for barley malt to convert): these as we have said include aged corn, wheat, rye and barley whiskies. The key thing about these latter, apart from their single grain character, is that they are like straight whiskeys in that distilled to a much lower proof than the base whiskies to which they are added. So, CC is made, I understand, by adding to a high-proof base both malted and unmalted (in effect) straight rye whiskey. Other Canadian blended whiskies are made by blending into the the base some aged corn whiskey (a type of Bourbon) and/or some barley whisky, and the combinations are endless as can be seen. In Alberta, I believe they blend just from the high proof aged base whisky (different years combined as Chuck suggested), it isn't a base in that case because I think they don't add the straight-type rye or corn whisky to these blends. Allied Domecq and the former Seagrams plants do however still use the traditional flavouring whiskies, which into the late 1940's were sold on their own too - as straight rye or straight bourbon. Old Seagram ads, for their Pedigree line up, clearly show this, they sold 100 proof straight rye and bourbon. Later they still made these but only to add to their high proof whisky to give flavour.

    Now, at least one Canadian whisky maker makes a craft-style whisky where it blends and then bottles the said barley, corn and rye whiskies. I forget the name of the brand that does this, the maker is Kittling Ridge I am quite sure, and the bottles come with a leaflet explaining how this is done. In this case, one would expect a rich palate if in fact the constituent whiskies were all straight-type (distilled to maximum 160 proof and aged in wood). In fact, that whisky is rather mild-tasting. I believe in that case, the "single grain" whiskies are not flavouring whiskeys as understood in Allied Domecq or Seagram's plants, but likely are simply high proof whisky albeit made from single grains (which indeed will make some flavour difference to that extent). If the constituents are true straight type whisky, they are aged and combined to give a light palate. That product is fairly unique though, I think all other Canadian whiskies are made as earlier discussed above, i.e., either they are blends of aged high-proof grain spirit (with the grain used in mashing not highly significant) or the latter with true straight-type whisky added to give more flavour. It is as if, in the latter case, someone 100 years said, "I'll use the new Scots-type grain whisky as my base and spice it with some real rye and/or real bourbon and/or single malt whisky" - in effect that is my understanding of how Hiram Walker devised the famous CC brand, except he used only rye whiskies to add the spicing (and still to this day that is how CC is made). CC 12 year old is in fact very good, it is a fine example of the Canadian blenders art. So is Crown Royal, a fairly complex-tasting whisky.

    Maybe a better way (than I suggested earlier) to make a "personalised" Canadian blend as good or better than those is to take a glass of, say, Black Velvet or Alberta Premium and add dashes of two or three straight ryes, or say a dash each of bourbon and a non-peated single malt. The results will often be extremely good. Most of my information by the way on how Canadian whisky is made is from books by Michael Jackson and Jim Murray. I have also read technical accounts of whisky making as currently applied in Alberta. I welcome any other information on Canadian whisky making and blending techniques, which seem, in comparison to Bourbon manufacture, not all that well publicised or understood.

    Gary

  8. #8
    Connoisseur
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    516

    Re: Canadians I\'d like to taste.

    Chuck,

    They did. It's Bush Pilot 13y Single Cask Reserve, and it's wonderful -- perhaps the best Canadian ever in the opinion of many. You may still find it in Chicago, look for small independent liquor stores. It's no longer made, collectors may be taking what's left.

    Omar

  9. #9
    Bourbonian of the Year 2011
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    8,982

    Re: Canadians I\'d like to taste.

    A new Canadian Club 15 years old is just out on the shelves of the Liquor Control Board of Ontario. A few years ago a 15 year old CC was marketed in a brown historic bottle reproduction. This new package, and I think the whisky, are different. The bottle is decanter-style, clear glass with beveled edges, and has a metallic knob closure. The price is in the mid $30 (CAN) range.

    This 15 year old strikes me as CC's best-ever blend. The CC 12 year old has less fullness and depth in comparison. The CC 10 year old Reserve likewise doesn't attain to the lush body and full taste of the 15 year old, nor does the 100 proof CC. The 15 year old is very Canadian in palate (oak-influenced, butterscotch caramel-like with rye tangs) but is much bigger in palate than almost any other Canadian whisky I know. It is as good I think as Canadian whisky can get (which is pretty good!). It resembles to a degree Century's 15 year old but has more finesse in my view. It is 80 proof and drinks very well neat. The straight rye-type flavouring whisky in there is evident. I am quite sure it contains some aged Lot 40-type whisky (CC's straight-type rye, absent from the shelves for some time now). I tasted it next to my own Canadian whisky blends; these are combos of various commercial Canadian whiskies and different U.S. straight ryes. The CC 15 year old more than gives mine a run for the money and offers a stylishness mine don't have. Mine are more ... robust, is a good word.

    I have had doubts about the willingness of the Canadian majors to introduce characterful new products but this one is a winner and (in comparative terms) the price is a steal..

    Gary

  10. #10
    Bourbonian of the Year 2009 and Virtuoso
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Houston, Tx
    Posts
    1,797

    Re: Canadians I\'d like to taste.

    I just saw the CC 15yo in a decorative tin here in Houston for around $15. Didn't buy one (they had a lot of it). But after reading your review, I can't go wrong for the price. When I try it, I'll respond with my impressions.

    Randy B.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Does Alcohol Have a Taste?
    By Gillman in forum Non-Whiskey Alcohol
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 11-14-2006, 00:37
  2. Couple of Canadians
    By Gillman in forum Foreign Whiskey
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-23-2004, 11:38
  3. A taste for bourbon
    By jeff in forum General Bourbon Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-06-2004, 20:02
  4. The bourbon I have never had and most want to taste is...?
    By Buckky in forum General Bourbon Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-03-2004, 12:06

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top