Welcome to the Straightbourbon.com Forums.
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Guru
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Central Arizona (near Prescott), U.S.A.
    Posts
    4,235

    The Barton Product Line

    In a thread about Black Maple Hill one thing led to another, and the subject of Barton bottlings came up.

    Chuck, I've already registered my lukewarm response to the Ridgemont Reserve 1792 (year of The Whiskey Rebellion? I should check). At the time, it was easier to order it from Hi Time than drive to Phoenix, so I didn't check. I guess Hi Time is no longer an option, having stopped shipping liquor out of CA.

    After trying the 1792, not only am I less likely to try the Ten High that you mentioned, I may quit bugging my son to snag a bottle of Barton BIB on one of his trips to Cincy.

    Am I correct to assume that there's a family resemblance and that the 1792 is the cream of the crop?

    Yours truly,
    Dave Morefield
    Last edited by bluesbassdad; 06-05-2006 at 16:59.
    Yours truly,
    Dave Morefield

    Dog Lover, Euphonium Player, Campfire Guitarist, Marksman,

  2. #2
    Bourbonian of the Year 2002 and Guru
    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    12,605
    1792, Kentucky statehood.

    I would say the Barton 1792 is more of a departure. Ten High is a small investment and if you don't like it, then you can stop wishing for a chance to try the VOB.

  3. #3
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Decatur GA
    Posts
    322
    Dave,
    FWIW, I am also lukewarm toward the 1792, although a little more forgiving than you. I consider the VOB 90 to be a distinctly better bourbon, and while I have not done a side-by-side, I did not notice any family resemblence (I sometimes have; Stagg brought OC 12 to mind at first drink, and something similar happened with BH and OGD 114). I've not had the Ten High.
    Bob

  4. #4
    Bourbonian of the Year 2002 and Guru
    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    12,605
    Back in the days of the glut--the good old days in some ways--Barton was putting whiskey into Ten High that was much older than four years and it was my every day pour. It was at least the equal of VOB and probably was very nearly the same whiskey. Today it's not as good as it was then, but still worth a try for, as I said, the relatively low investment.

  5. #5
    Guru
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Central Arizona (near Prescott), U.S.A.
    Posts
    4,235
    Chuck,

    The biggest plus to me is that it's available right here in central Arizona at what may be the world's smallest liquor store (inexplicably called "Liquor Barn" -- must have been small cattle in these parts, back in the day).

    The next time I feel like going bottom-shelf, perhaps after a stock market sell-off, I'll pick up a bottle.

    Yours truly,
    Dave Morefield
    Yours truly,
    Dave Morefield

    Dog Lover, Euphonium Player, Campfire Guitarist, Marksman,

  6. #6
    Bourbonian of the Year 2002 and Guru
    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    12,605
    Quote Originally Posted by bluesbassdad
    The next time I feel like going bottom-shelf, perhaps after a stock market sell-off, I'll pick up a bottle.
    This just might be the week.

  7. #7
    Advanced Taster
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    125
    I like the VOB 90 better than the 1792, but I do taste the family resemblance. Still, I pine for when VOB was an 8 YO, 86 proof, except for the 100 BIB.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. mashbill or final product?
    By cas in forum General Bourbon Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-02-2005, 18:33
  2. Nifty New Product--the Alco Sachet
    By cowdery in forum Paraphernalia
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-03-2004, 02:13
  3. Product Naming
    By bluesbassdad in forum Foreign Whiskey
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-11-2002, 07:35
  4. New Product Wish List
    By bourbonmed in forum General Bourbon Discussion
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 09-09-2002, 20:14

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top