Welcome to the Straightbourbon.com Forums.
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1

    Wasmund's Single Malt Whisky

    I recently found this new single malt whisky that is made in the Virginia mountains using traditional floor malting like they do in Scotland. Where it differs with Scotch whisky is that they don't use peat to dry the malt but they use apple wood. I am going out to visit the distillery tomorrow where I hope to get a sample.

    http://copperfox.biz

    Scott
    Too much of anything is bad, but too much of good whisky is barely enough. - Mark Twain

  2. #2
    Virtuoso
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Chicago SW 'burbs
    Posts
    1,178
    I have another American single malt in my bunker, St. George's. I'm not sure if it's actually floor malted, but the malt is smoked with beech and alder woods, rather than peat. While I don't consider it a daily drinker, it's a nice treat - my bottle has a rather surprising cocoa note to it.
    Oh no! You have walked into the slavering fangs of a lurking grue!

  3. #3
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Bristow, VA
    Posts
    340
    Engh. A real honeyed raw-whiskey edge, and wood tannin. This has the same problem of wines whose producers use wood chips for oak flavor. It doesn't integrate.

    This is a fascinating project, a barley malt whiskey with some serious terroir. But the (cash-necessary?) shortcut to market does not befit it.
    Jake Parrott
    Ledroit Brands, LLC

  4. #4
    Bourbonian of the Year 2002 and Guru
    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    12,621
    Someone may need to talk me in off the ledge on this, but I think there is something fundamentally wrong with American micro-distillers trying to make malt whiskey. Am I crazy?

  5. #5
    Guru
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Central Arizona (near Prescott), U.S.A.
    Posts
    4,235
    Chuck,

    Not where this topic is concerned.

    What are they thinking?

    I can imagine that maybe a rigorous market analysis pointed in this direction, but I don't care. It's still wrong in some greater sense.

    They only way it would make sense to me is if the proprietors are Scots.

    Yours truly,
    Dave Morefield
    Yours truly,
    Dave Morefield

    Dog Lover, Euphonium Player, Campfire Guitarist, Marksman,

  6. #6
    Connoisseur
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    NJ, USA
    Posts
    834
    If they make decent Whiskey I have absolutely no problem with it. On the other hand If they make crap and charge a lot for it...
    Tim

    I am going where streams of whiskey are flowing...

  7. #7
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Bristow, VA
    Posts
    340
    What DB said. There's nothing wrong with them trying, and Wasmund's distillate has as much or more terroir as any whiskey in the world. But it's a pretty dear tariff for such a raw-tasting final product.
    Jake Parrott
    Ledroit Brands, LLC

  8. #8
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    295
    Any new distillery faces the challenge of balancing the need to age its distillate with the need to generate revenue. I suspect, based purely on my non-scientific gut feeling, that there is a part of the market that will pay more for underaged malt whiskey than it will for very young bourbon. Come to think of it, the market will generally pay more for older malt whiskey than for older bourbon, too. That, plus less complicated mashing, may explain why new small-scale distilleries tend to focus on malt whiskey. And it's tough to blame them for selling at least some of the distillate young, to make a little money. One only hopes that by doing so they don't irreparably tarnish the image of their product. Serious enthusiasts (like us, of course) may understand that today's nasty two-year-old spirit can become tomorrow's sublime eight-year-old spirit, but there is a risk that the distillery will get a reputation for making "bad whiskey" based on selling whiskey before it's ready.

  9. #9
    Bourbonian of the Year 2002 and Guru
    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    12,621
    Another reason, which may have been what you had in mind when you mentioned the "less complicated mashing" is that micro-distillers can draw on the experience of micro-brewers in making and working with a malt mash and, for that matter, the mechanics of separation and so forth. Until you hop it, making beer and making malt whisky are the same process. I know of at least one micro-distiller that is simply acquiring its "beer" from a local micro-brewer.

  10. #10
    Bourbonian of the Year 2011
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    9,127
    In my beer-focused days (and still) I can't count the times I would tell whisky snobs this very thing - they who looked down on beer needed to know that their fave drink was just a concentrated form of it (sans hops because the alcohol preserved it, you didn't the hops). Somehow it didn't seem to convince many of them, so rooted are "les idees recues"...

    Gary

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Old Potrero Single Malt Spirit
    By elkdoggydog in forum Other American Whiskey Tastings
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 03-13-2008, 04:01
  2. Michael Collins Single Malt Irish Whiskey
    By Gillman in forum Foreign Whiskey
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-14-2006, 10:55
  3. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-31-2006, 06:23
  4. Coming not so soon- Nashoba "Single-Malt" Whiskey
    By pbrian in forum Other American Whiskey
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-19-2006, 16:13
  5. McCarthy's Oregon Single-Malt Whiskey
    By T47 in forum Other American Whiskey
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-10-2006, 15:05

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top