Welcome to the Straightbourbon.com Forums.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    Bourbonian of the Year 2002 and Guru
    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    12,616

    Saz Jr v Rittenhouse BIB

    Last night I followed a glass of Saz Jr with one of Rittenhouse BIB and the difference was really striking. The Rittenhouse is more bourbon-like and the Saz has that slight (and entirely pleasant) mustiness that some of the BT bourbons have too. The Saz also seems drier. Both are very enjoyable, but very different.

  2. #2
    Bourbonian Of The Year 2013 and Guru
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Just East of the Big Chicken, GA
    Posts
    6,109

    Re: Saz Jr v Rittenhouse BIB

    I agree. The thing I really like about the Saz Jr. is that it is so different. I really can't tell you what rye should, or does, taste like in a whiskey. But, I can tell you that the Saz does not taste like most bourbons. It is an entirely different animal. The Rit is definitely more bourbon-like to me, almost to the point I could confuse it with a high-rye bourbon. Not so with the Saz Jr.

    But I do love them both.

    JOE

  3. #3
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Decatur GA
    Posts
    322

    Re: Saz Jr v Rittenhouse BIB

    Maybe I shouldn't post in this thread since I haven't been able to get a bottle of the Rittenhouse, but I did (finally) find a Saz Jr. over the holidays. And I have to say that the mustiness, for me, is not slight, but overpowering, and not at all pleasant. It's disappointing, because I enjoy rye and really wanted to love this one. I have 2003 and 2005 bottles of the 18, and tasting them all together brings out the mustiness in the 2005 to level I don't like; in the 2003, it's there in just the right amount. The experience has reinforced the 2003 as one of the best whiskeys I've tasted, but it's getting low; I was nursing it before, now it will be worse since I fear any "replacement" will fall short.

    I'll keep coming back to the Saz Jr. for a while; having the bottle open for a while has helped me with Old Overholt a lot. But I've had it several times in the last month, and haven't warmed to it. Probably should just put it away for a few months.

    Bob

  4. #4
    Guru
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Las Vegas NV
    Posts
    2,098

    Re: Saz Jr v Rittenhouse BIB

    I found that the mustiness in Saz Jr. was not at all what I expected. I have had 3 drinks from this bottle and as of right now I am very pleased. Just picked up the Riitenhouse BIB and was targeting it for Manhattans, but be sure that I will take some tastes neat.
    Emancipate yourself from mental slavery. None but ourselves can free our minds.

    Bob Marley.

  5. #5

    Re: Saz Jr v Rittenhouse BIB

    I just tried this in the opposite order. To me, they are on a similar vector away from bourbon, but the Sazerac is about 2-3x as far as the Rittenhouse (hence I agree it's really different). I get from both a grassy note and an astringent finish, but the Sazerac is grassier and finishes much longer. I'm not sure what you guys mean by musty; can you add any detail? The closest I get is maybe old leather book bindings (which I like)...

  6. #6
    Bourbonian of the Year 2002 and Guru
    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    12,616

    Re: Saz Jr v Rittenhouse BIB

    Tim described it perfectly in another thread. To paraphrase, it tastes exactly like the inside of a whiskey warehouse smells. It's wood, but not in the normal sense. I mean it really tastes like a whiskey barrel.

  7. #7
    Guru
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Northwest of Peoria
    Posts
    4,437

    Re: Saz Jr v Rittenhouse BIB

    Quote Originally Posted by afisher View Post
    I just tried this in the opposite order. To me, they are on a similar vector away from bourbon, but the Sazerac is about 2-3x as far as the Rittenhouse (hence I agree it's really different). I get from both a grassy note and an astringent finish, but the Sazerac is grassier and finishes much longer. I'm not sure what you guys mean by musty; can you add any detail? The closest I get is maybe old leather book bindings (which I like)...
    In another thread I described the taste of Saz jr very similarly. Nice to know I'm not alone.

    Quote Originally Posted by ILLfarmboy View Post
    I find one of the main taste elements in baby saz very similar to the way the pages of a leather bound book smelled. Not just any book but a specific edition of the collected writings of Poe. Sadly I no longer have it, an old girlfriend stole it along with a lot of other stuff.

  8. #8
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, Michigan
    Posts
    479

    Re: Saz Jr v Rittenhouse BIB

    Quote Originally Posted by cowdery View Post
    ... Saz Jr ... has that slight (and entirely pleasant) mustiness that some of the BT bourbons have too.
    Quote Originally Posted by BobA View Post
    ... the mustiness, for me, is not slight, but overpowering, and not at all pleasant. It's disappointing, because I enjoy rye and really wanted to love this one.
    I'm sorry to say that I'm with Bob on this (not that I'm sorry to agree with Bob, but sorry about the mustiness ).

    The BT mustiness has spoiled some otherwise wonderful whiskeys for me - two Cork 'n' Bottle single barrel BT's and Saz Jr as well. Interestingly, it was not present in the samples of the C'n'B bottlings that I tried at the shop, but it was in the bottles I bought - more so in one than in the other. I wondered at the time if they were from bad corks.

    I am very sensitive to that earthy or musty character (I've been tested on it in "doctored" samples of beer) and I find it very unpleasant. It reminds me of a damp, musty earthy cellar. I can't believe that BT wants to have it in their whiskeys.

    I have an older bottling of BT and an '04 10yo AAA that are completely lacking in this character, and they are wonderful. But it spoils the bottles that have it.

    I am also a big fan of rye - I actually prefer it in general to bourbon, and like Bob, I really wanted to like Saz Jr, but I have trouble getting past this character. I consider it a flaw, especially as it seems new to me - last two to three years or so.

    I wonder if Ken Weber would care to comment on this "house character."

    Jeff
    "One never knows, do one?" Fats Waller, American Musician, 1904-1943

  9. #9
    Guru
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Northwest of Peoria
    Posts
    4,437

    Re: Saz Jr v Rittenhouse BIB

    Jeff, Do you like Handy? I find the same "old leather book" quality in Thomas Handy as well, albeit subdued and eclipsed by "spice" and "clove"?

  10. #10
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Decatur GA
    Posts
    322

    Re: Saz Jr v Rittenhouse BIB

    I'm happy to agree with Jeff. Not happy that we have both been disappointed in the Saz Jr., but happy that he has well decribed the mustiness I get; "damp, musty, earthy cellar" is it. Haven't really noticed it in BT bottlings in general, just that 2005 Saz I mentioned. The OC 12, Stagg, ER 10/101 are all fairly common pours for me, but it's only been in the rye. Hope it's not a developing house taste; I've counted on the OC 12 as being a "regular" for years to come.

    Bob

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. When Good Saz Goes Bad?
    By scratchline in forum American Rye Whiskey
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 02-13-2007, 17:49
  2. Saz Jr. in Austin?
    By tachyonshuggy in forum American Rye Whiskey
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-24-2007, 20:13
  3. Rittenhouse Rye
    By cowdery in forum Other American Whiskey Tastings
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 10-29-2006, 17:00
  4. Rittenhouse Rye BiB
    By BourbonJoe in forum American Rye Whiskey
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-31-2006, 04:18

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top