Jump to content

A Brain Teaser


cowdery
This topic has been inactive for at least 365 days, and is now closed. Please feel free to start a new thread on the subject! 

Recommended Posts

Riddle me this, Batman.

When is whiskey not whiskey?

Arguably, when it's sorghum whiskey.

Queen Jennie Sorghum Whiskey is a product of the Old Sugar Distillery in Madison, Wisconsin.

The rules say whiskey is "an alcoholic distillate from a fermented mash of grain." The U.S. Grains Council describes, Sorghum bicolor, the species in question, as the "fifth most important cereal crop grown in the world."

So no problem, right? Sorghum is a cereal, i.e., a grain, so sorghum spirit is whiskey. The TTB obviously agrees, because Old Sugar got its label approved and is selling the product now.

But Old Sugar's product, and other distilled spirits made from sorghum, is not made from the plant's seeds--as is the case with whiskeys made from corn, barley, wheat, rye, etc.--but rather from a sweet liquid derived by squeezing the plant's stalk, much like sugar cane. Sugar cane, it should be noted, is also a grass, like corn and the other cereals, but spirits made from its sugary juice are classified as rum, not whiskey. Phil Prichard, he of the Tennessee distillery that bears his name, has argued that sorghum spirit should be classified as rum.

Unfortunately, the rule for rum is explicit. The source must be sugar cane. But since the sorghum plant's seeds are not used to make sorghum spirit, it's clearly not made from "a fermented mash of grain," and so shouldn't be classified as whiskey either.

Old Sugar follows the rules. Their sorghum whiskey is aged in charred oak barrels. It's not clear if those barrels are single-use, as required for bourbon, et al, but let's assume they are. It certainly is a legitimate distilled spirit product, but is it whiskey?

All spirits made from grain go through a process in which enzymes are used to convert grain starches into sugar, so fermentation can take place. Sorghum juice is sugar already, like cane, and so doesn't go through that process. The resulting liquor is also more rum-like than whiskey-like, so someone expecting whiskey characteristics will be disappointed.

So, what do you think? The Batputer fried its circuits on this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Opens up debate for a new spirit category of "other" with this one called "Rumiskey". No clear answer here other than stimulating a volleying debate which would be fun over a real whisk(e)y or two or...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being a grass stem product I see it one of two ways, unaged it's vodka or aged in charred oak casks it's rum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While "corn" the grain is used in whiskey, if you used "corn syrup" - the end result would be more like rum. I think thee part of the plant used has to be important. Although, I think the real question is the "spirit of the law" vs the "letter of the law". By the letter of the law, maybe it is whiskey. But the by the spirit of the law, absolutely not. And why does the law exist if not to protect the integrity of the marketplace so that someone doesn't label rum (or anything else) "whiskey"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the simpler Canadian approach of simply requiring the final product be of the nature and character of whisky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the simpler Canadian approach of simply requiring the final product be of the nature and character of whisky.

You're joking, right?

The Canadian approach leads to whisky being called "rye" when many don't contain much (if any*) rye grain. Further, it allows for addition of: up to 1/11 of just about anything plus artificial colour. So yeah, its a great approach.:rolleyes:

*Century Reserve lot 15/25 is called "Canadian Rye" and its made from 100% corn.

Edited by portwood
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, seriously no thank you to that Canadian definition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I'm not joking, quite the opposite and I believe that's a clearer description than labeling a sorghum molasses distillate whisky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's not really whiskey, just like an undistilled fermented beverage produced from the syrup wouldn't be beer. But that doesn't matter to me, it sounds like an interesting, unique spirit that I'd like to try.

The trouble is that it sells bottles to have them say "whiskey" on them, so of course Old Sugar wants to use that word.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A rose by any other name.....................

How about Sorghum Spirits?

And if one where to use "corn syrup" is would NOT be more like rum, corn syrup is made from actual corn, grain, not stalk squeezings.......

Perhaps they should drop the "e" and no would would care.............Whisky!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if one where to use "corn syrup" is would NOT be more like rum, corn syrup is made from actual corn, grain, not stalk squeezings.......
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The spirit of the TTB regs would make it rum, even if it doesn't fit "Spirits distilled from the fermented juice of sugar cane, sugar cane syrup, sugar cane molasses or other sugar cane by-products".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the record, corn syrup is derived from corn (maize) kernels, i.e., grain. It isn't produced by squeezing corn stalks. I don't see anything in the rules that would prevent a distiller from using corn syrup to make bourbon.

Under the rules as now written, Queen Jennie is a distilled spirit specialty. Using Jack Daniel's Tennessee Rye as an example, they could classify it as "spirits distilled from sorghum syrup," if they wanted to. "Sorghum Spirits" would also be acceptable. But no way it's whiskey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

more importantly, is it any good?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

more importantly, is it any good?

Wadewood has raised the paramount question here. Does anyone have an answer.............................Col?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe we should ask Robert Parker.

He will like it. He likes everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have not had this product but the only sorghum 'whiskey' I have had, from Southeast Asia, was horrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Legally, I believe this would be called a Distilled Spirits Specialty since technically it doesn't fit into any pre-defined genre of spirits

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

more importantly, is it any good?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.