Jump to content

True or False


Blitz
This topic has been inactive for at least 365 days, and is now closed. Please feel free to start a new thread on the subject! 

Recommended Posts

I just took a bourbon quiz on-line. I got one answer wrong. Would you have answered correct? Here's the question:

TRUE OR FALSE:

Kentucky is the only state allowed to put its name on a bourbon label.

No looking it up. Just hit reply and answer. We'll see how everybody does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just took a bourbon quiz on-line. I got one answer wrong. Would you have answered correct? Here's the question:

TRUE OR FALSE:

Kentucky is the only state allowed to put its name on a bourbon label.

No looking it up. Just hit reply and answer. We'll see how everybody does.

False! I have bourbon from other states

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other states can put the label bourbon on there products, so long as they follow the rules. 51% corn, new oak barrells ,etc. What they can't put , is Kentucky Straight Bourbon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you found the rule, or the exception?

Well it only takes one example to prove the following is not true:

Kentucky is the only state allowed to put its name on a bourbon label.

Plus, if a distillery is able to produce bourbon in other states, they must be able to put that on the label when they identify their location.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the answer. Don't shoot the messenger. Remember this started because I was thinking the same as you guys. It's from the Knob Creek web site. You have to register. It's called the 'Bernie Lubber label reading quiz'. Anybody heard of him? The quiz is only six questions. Not really worth the effort.

So, I said False. This is what it came back with:

Wrong. Though bourbon can be made anywhere in the U.S., Kentucky is the only state that can be mentioned on a bourbon label.

Seems we have a controversy to resolve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We know from the above link to peachtreedistillers.com that

"Though bourbon can be made anywhere in the U.S., Kentucky is the only state that can be mentioned on a bourbon label."

is false, though perhaps peachtreedistillers has made a transgression in their labeling.

I would have answered true.

I would also say that a Virgina Gentleman is a man, not a state, and Hudson Bay is a body of water, not a state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like hokum to me. There is nothing in the regs that says anything about using states on the label. The word Kentucky doesn't even appear in them. We all know that Bourbon can be made anywhere in the US and I would be surprised if there is some authority saying only Kentucky can be on the bottle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

False, although this is a very persistent myth.

Bernie Lubbers is a Jim Beam shill, a trained monkey who doesn't know anything that Jim Kokoris didn't tell him. Perfect example of Jim Beam spreading sloppy information. I defy anyone to cite the rule, because it doesn't exist.

It's not even logical. The government of Kentucky has no jurisdiction outside of Kentucky, so it can't be their rule, and why would the federal government give that special protection to Kentucky?

Who ya gonna believe, me or Bernie Lubbers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We know from the above link to peachtreedistillers.com that

"Though bourbon can be made anywhere in the U.S., Kentucky is the only state that can be mentioned on a bourbon label."

is false, though perhaps peachtreedistillers has made a transgression in their labeling.

I would have answered true.

I would also say that a Virgina Gentleman is a man, not a state, and Hudson Bay is a body of water, not a state.

That body of water sure makes great bourbon.:cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not even logical. The government of Kentucky has no jurisdiction outside of Kentucky, so it can't be their rule, and why would the federal government give that special protection to Kentucky?

Were it true, it would hardly be surprising. The government has done many things with less logic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who ya gonna believe, me or Bernie Lubbers?

Well, in this case you. I have never seen (pick a state) straight bourbon whiskey, but as far as I can tell there is no reason you could not have it. In fact, I am sure that over time you will as a slap at the KY dominated market.

I would love a glass of the Cowdery Straight Illinois Bourbon Whiskey.

8-15 yrs, 100-103 proof please Chuck with a nice rye & wheat blend for the mash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I sent them an email question asking for the source of their claim. See what happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The regulations for whiskey written right after prohibition specifically said no other state could be used as a descriptor to the term "Straight Bourbon" except Kentucky. I have seen it as well in books stating the regulations for the different types of whiskey written in the 1950's. If this has changed, then I would say it came with Reagan's de-regulation of the industry in the 1980's. I doubt that the distillers would want to change that regulation so I would say "True" is the correct answer to the question.

Mike Veach

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. You have 2 people (Chuck C. and Mike V.), whose opinions in bourbon matters I respect extremely much, giving opposing answers on this. This would lead me to believe that the regs must be fairly muddled, for this to be so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.