bourbonv Posted June 5, 2010 Share Posted June 5, 2010 The law suit has been filed and it is over the use of the term "Kentucky Bourbon Trail". Sazerac is trying to negate the KDA trademark of the term. If that happens then anybody can place themselves on the "Kentucky Bourbon Trail" and we could see the"Kentucky Bourbon Trail Wendy's" and the "Kentucky Bourbon Trail Sewer Service" since anybody will be able to use the term. The KDA is fighting to save their trademark.Mike Veach Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OscarV Posted June 5, 2010 Share Posted June 5, 2010 The KDA is fighting to save their trademark.Mike Veach[QUOTE][/QUOTE]That seems perfectly resonable.I wish KDA a success in court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pepcycle Posted June 5, 2010 Share Posted June 5, 2010 Why does Sazerac have to infringe? Because they chose to opt out of THE bourbon trail. Why are they out?Because they don't get any benefit from KDA?Why not?Who knows?My point is that if KDA wants distilleries in and to supprt their trail, then they should support other cities besides Bardstown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigthom Posted June 5, 2010 Author Share Posted June 5, 2010 While I agree that the KDA needs to do things outside Bardstown, Sazerac now has a large distillery there and will have the same benefit that Heaven Hill and Jim Beam do.It would be nice if the festival was held every other year in Lawrenceburg. There are two distilleries there and two more close enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Posted June 5, 2010 Share Posted June 5, 2010 There's a lot of planning, expense, and work to do putting on an event like KBF. Do the other cities want to do it? Do they have the money, facilities, manpower, and local interest to do it? Louisville or Lawrenceburg could easily host an activity at a non conflicting time if they so desire. I think the reason Bardstown has it is because they have the manpower, facilities (including the Getz), time, etc to do it. They also have a spark plug in their tourist bureau named Johanna. Any city wishing to vie with them would also need such a spark plug.My two cents worth, and I'll give you two pennies change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowdery Posted June 5, 2010 Share Posted June 5, 2010 I can't seem to get to the bottom of this dispute but I can tell you it has very little to do with the Kentucky Bourbon Festival or any perceived regional favoritism on the part of the KDA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OscarV Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 Here's another little addition to the story.The first Laky of KY announced that 17 new highway signs to direct people to bourbon distilleries as part of the Kentucky Bourbon Trail.Sure enough, no BT.http://www.kentucky.com/2010/08/25/1406087/new-signs-to-mark-kentuckey-bourbon-trail.html#ixzz0xiuTPgw5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bourbon Boiler Posted August 28, 2010 Share Posted August 28, 2010 Here's another little addition to the story.The first Laky of KY announced that 17 new highway signs to direct people to bourbon distilleries as part of the Kentucky Bourbon Trail.Sure enough, no BT.http://www.kentucky.com/2010/08/25/1406087/new-signs-to-mark-kentuckey-bourbon-trail.html#ixzz0xiuTPgw5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Posted November 10, 2010 Share Posted November 10, 2010 Anybody have any updates on this business? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OscarV Posted November 10, 2010 Share Posted November 10, 2010 Anybody have any updates on this business?[QUOTE][/QUOTE]Yeah, where's Mike AKA BourbonV?He always has the latest on this kind of stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OscarV Posted October 20, 2011 Share Posted October 20, 2011 Almost a year later, any word on what this was all about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p_elliott Posted October 21, 2011 Share Posted October 21, 2011 It was over an advertising campaign that BT wanted to use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Posted October 21, 2011 Share Posted October 21, 2011 It was over an advertising campaign that BT wanted to use.Anywhere we can find information on that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
callmeox Posted October 21, 2011 Share Posted October 21, 2011 Anywhere we can find information on that?I was wondering the same thing. Do tell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tucker Posted October 21, 2011 Share Posted October 21, 2011 Anywhere we can find information on that?A good summary of the initial complaint can be found here (you have to scroll down a good bit).http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-05-07/rolls-royce-utc-apple-victoria-s-secret-sazerac-intellectual-property.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barturtle Posted October 21, 2011 Share Posted October 21, 2011 This is what it's all about: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Posted October 21, 2011 Share Posted October 21, 2011 Ah...I see.I still don't get why Saz pulled out of the KDA in the first place. Diageo is a member for chrissakes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barturtle Posted October 21, 2011 Share Posted October 21, 2011 Browsing the KDA site, I find this statement interestingConsolidation has reduced KDA’s current membership to six companies, representing seven distilleries, which together produce 95 percent of the world’s Bourbon: Beam Global Spirits & Wine, Brown-Forman, Diageo North America, Four Roses, Heaven Hill, and Wild Turkey. Surely BT/Barton/Independents account for more than 5%? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jburlowski Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 A settlement has been reached:http://news.cincinnati.com/article/20111117/NEWS0103/111180316/Dispute-over-Kentucky-Bourbon-Trail-settled Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Posted November 21, 2011 Share Posted November 21, 2011 We still don't know why Saz withdrew from the KDA in the first place, or what the precise source of the bad blood between Saz and the KDA. I think Chuck suggested there may have been some tension between Saz and HH based on their former contract relationship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p_elliott Posted November 21, 2011 Share Posted November 21, 2011 Josh Sazerac and KDA got into a fight over a copyright infringement. BT wanted to use the line "on the bourbon trail" in their ads. KDA said you can't do that it's our copyright. They got mad at each other law suits were filed and BT and Sazerac pulled out of the KDA. The suit has been settled out of court with BT being able to use that ad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowdery Posted November 21, 2011 Share Posted November 21, 2011 Trademark, not copyright, and that's what the lawsuit was about. I don't think the bad blood between Sazerac and HH had anything to do with it and I never suggested that it did. That's not so much institutional as it is personal, i.e., an old grudge between Max Shapira and Bill Goldring.Sazerac says KDA membership is expensive and they believe that money can be better spent in other ways.No one seems to really know (or will say) except to speculate that Sazerac felt its influence within the KDA wasn't what it should be.The settlement appears to mean that neither side is going to waste time and money on futile lawsuits, but that doesn't mean all is now well. There has been no talk of Sazerac rejoining KDA, for example. Sazerac also appears to have abandoned its own attempt to re-trademark 'bourbon trail' as part of its own tourism 'brand.'The settlement is more like a ceasefire than a peace treaty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Posted November 21, 2011 Share Posted November 21, 2011 I didn't mean to imply that I thought the lawsuit simply the result of "bad blood" or that Chuck thought it was. It was just nosiness on my part. I was interested in the nature and origins of the aforementioned "bad blood". Thanks for answering my questions, Chuck, and thanks for the rest of the information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p_elliott Posted November 21, 2011 Share Posted November 21, 2011 Trademark / Copyright I was close but no cigar :grin: I'm not a lawyer like you Chuck. I know the difference now that you pointed it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowdery Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 I've never understood exactly what happened between Sazerac and Heaven Hill. I think it was because Sazerac bought BT and stopped buying bourbon from HH. Something like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts