Jump to content

Antarctica Whiskey


kickert
This topic has been inactive for at least 365 days, and is now closed. Please feel free to start a new thread on the subject! 

Recommended Posts

Not really sure where to post this, but I found this article interesting. It is a story about Earnest Shackleton's whiskey from 1909 that was buried in ice and only now being uncovered. At the time, it was a 10yr old Scotch.

I would be willing to sample it... for quality control purposes of course....

http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/shackleton-s-whisky-finally-sees-daylight-3700051

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I read that correctly it seems a waste that after samples are drawn it's going back to the ice that it came from.

Whats the point of that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I read that correctly it seems a waste that after samples are drawn it's going back to the ice that it came from.

Whats the point of that?

I was under the impression that a small sample would be drawn, the bottles would be preserved by this New Zealand museum the the crates (minus the bottles) would be returned. That might not have been in this article I posted... I read a few about it.

Even then though you can ask: "what's the point."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole talk of trying to replicate the "lost recipe" seems a bit bogus to me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are people on the board that understand the process better than I would, but I would guess the mashbill could be dupliacted, but the yeast strain would be a bit difficult.

My biggest thing is that there is no way to know what it would have tasted like when it was produced by drinking something that is now 100 years old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
The whole talk of trying to replicate the "lost recipe" seems a bit bogus to me.

Well, according to Whisky Intelligence: Whyte & Mackay has successfully

recreated the century-old whisky buried under the Antarctic ice by famous

explorer Ernest Shackleton.

The company’s master blender Richard Paterson spent a painstaking eight

weeks marrying and blending a range of malts to get an exact replica of the

100-year-old Mackinlay’s liquid.

And according to one independent expert, he has got the copy exactly

right.

Renowned whisky writer Dave Broom is the only other person in the world to

taste both the original whisky and Whyte & Mackay’s new liquid.

He said: “The Shackleton whisky is not what I expected at all, and not

what anyone would have expected. It’s so light, so fresh, so delicate and

still in one piece – it’s a gorgeous whisky.

“I think the replication is absolutely bang on. Richard has done a great job

as it’s a very tricky whisky to replicate, because you have this delicacy,

subtlety and the smoke just coming through."

Tasting notes and additional info at the link above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...Richard Paterson...according to one independent expert, he has got the copy exactly

right.

Ben's point remains.

Paterson can perfectly emulate what that whisky is now, not what it was a century ago.

Roger

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Ben's point remains.

Paterson can perfectly emulate what that whisky is now, not what it was a century ago.

Roger

But is there any reason to think it has changed appreciably in the bottles, especially given that the cold temperatures should theoretically slow any oxidation significantly?

/not a rhetorical question

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

If anyone is interested in buying the Shackleton "recreation",

SV has it available for $145./bottle.

"Let me make one thing perfectly clear. This Mackinlay's is not the

actual whisky they found in the permafrost. It's a "replica" release,

which means the distillery blended the whisky to taste exactly like

this historic Scotch. Only 500 bottles were released into the US

and I was lucky to get more than my fair share. I can honestly say

this is one of the best packages I have seen in a long time."

Limited to 50,000 bottles.

Malt Advocate Rating: 92pts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would probably be interesting to taste, but it obviously hasn't aged long and there's no reason for it to be rare, particularly if it is well liked. I'd be interested in reading a trained tounge's take on how well they reproduced the find.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A blended Scotch malt for $145 because it's supposed to taste like a really old and really cold whiskey that was accidentally found in Antarctica. This sounds like satire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.