OscarV Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 Here's some interesting news from a distillery's press release.Makes me want to open one.**Pappy Van Winkle 23 Year Old Bourbon Named "Spirit of the Year"Buffalo Trace Distillery 10/19/2010FRANKFORT, Franklin County, Ky (Oct. 19, 2010) – Wine and Spirits Magazine has named Pappy Van Winkle 23 Year Old Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey “Spirit of the Year†in its annual buying guide issue. There are only eight spirits of the year in the issue, and Pappy Van Winkle 23 is the only bourbon. “We are honored to receive this recognition from Wine and Spirits, one of the most respected publications in the spirits industry,†said Julian Van Winkle III. “This caps off an unbelievably successful year for the Van Winkle line as a whole, with major wins for Pappy 15 at the Los Angeles International Wine and Spirits Competition and Pappy 20 at both the International Wine and Spirits Competition and the San Francisco World Spirits Competition.†Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgtgto Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 Here's some interesting news from a distillery's press release.Makes me want to open one.**Pappy Van Winkle 23 Year Old Bourbon Named "Spirit of the Year"Buffalo Trace Distillery 10/19/2010FRANKFORT, Franklin County, Ky (Oct. 19, 2010) – Wine and Spirits Magazine has named Pappy Van Winkle 23 Year Old Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey “Spirit of the Year†in its annual buying guide issue. There are only eight spirits of the year in the issue, and Pappy Van Winkle 23 is the only bourbon. “We are honored to receive this recognition from Wine and Spirits, one of the most respected publications in the spirits industry,†said Julian Van Winkle III. “This caps off an unbelievably successful year for the Van Winkle line as a whole, with major wins for Pappy 15 at the Los Angeles International Wine and Spirits Competition and Pappy 20 at both the International Wine and Spirits Competition and the San Francisco World Spirits Competition.†I had some 2 nights ago. My thoughts were NOT "Wow, this should be spirit of the year!".. more along the lines of "Why did they let this age so long?". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OscarV Posted October 19, 2010 Author Share Posted October 19, 2010 "Why did they let this age so long?".Really?Hmmm, now I don't know if I should get one or not.OK, here's what we can do to settle this issue.Everyone out there send me a 200ml sample of the Pappy 23 in your possession and I will try them all and report back asap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMOWK Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 more along the lines of "Why did they let this age so long?".How do you feel about the 20? A lot of folks seem to think that is aged too long as well. I don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OscarV Posted October 19, 2010 Author Share Posted October 19, 2010 How do you feel about the 20? A lot of folks seem to think that is aged too long as well. I don't.The 20 aged to long? That's the first time I have ever heard of such a thing.I have always thought of the Pap 20 as a light weight single layered sort of OK bourbon that I love if you are buying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMOWK Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 I have always thought of the Pap 20 as a light weight single layered sort of OK bourbon that I love if you are buying.So cost is a factor when rating whiskey? I try to keep it out of the equation by having my girlfriend pour me "something that's open on the shelf", and judging it that way. Pappy 20 is usually picked easily from the crowd. It also helps for when/if I ever enter the BOTY competition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OscarV Posted October 19, 2010 Author Share Posted October 19, 2010 So cost is a factor when rating whiskey? I try to keep it out of the equation by having my girlfriend pour me "something that's open on the shelf", and judging it that way. Pappy 20 is usually picked easily from the crowd. It also helps for when/if I ever enter the BOTY competition.[QUOTE][/QUOTE]Rock on my Brother from another Mother.I can't say no more cuz I haven't seen your whole shelf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WsmataU Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 Personally I think PVW23 is way overpriced. I've tried all the Van Winkle Products (except the ORVW23 I'm saving) and the 20 is by far my favorite. Price should be considered as well which would put the 15 ahead of the 23yr IMHO, but neither one tastes as good as the 20 to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bourbonNOOG Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 I'm in the same boat with the 23. I have a half empty bottle of the 23 sitting on the shelf from vacation. It's good but not even close to an extra $129 good (compared to the 20). I've had the Lot B and haven't ever seen the 15 in my parts (hopefully this year). I'm a big fan of the Rye. Found a local store that has a bottle of 20 on the shelf. I've been thinking about grabbing it for a day or 2 now, but just haven't made it by. I think tomorrow will be the day! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kickert Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 The 20 aged to long? That's the first time I have ever heard of such a thing.I have always thought of the Pap 20 as a light weight single layered sort of OK bourbon that I love if you are buying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErichPryde Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 I think that the 20 aged rather well, actually. It's just too plain. If I wanted something like it and plain yet good, I'd buy the Lot B for the cost.Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying there is anything wrong with Pappy 20. It's smooth and easy to drink. I just think that 100 dollars a bottle is way too much to be asking. Likewise, the PVW23 is way, wayyy too expensive. It is very interesting bourbon, though, and nothing like the 20 or the 15. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barturtle Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 I've had people trying to convince me for years that Pappy 23 was the be-all, end-all of bourbon and that Pappy 20 was the only acceptable alternative. I think they're nuts. I find them both to be over-aged and tired. I'm a firm believer that S-W hits its stride at 12yo, peaks at 15-16 yo and quickly goes downhill...and I invite anyone to start cracking bottles of every age and label to try to prove me wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmarkle Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 I think the 20 is too old. I also think EC18 is too old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 I think that the 20 aged rather well, actually. It's just too plain. If I wanted something like it and plain yet good, I'd buy the Lot B for the cost.Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying there is anything wrong with Pappy 20. It's smooth and easy to drink. I just think that 100 dollars a bottle is way too much to be asking. Likewise, the PVW23 is way, wayyy too expensive. It is very interesting bourbon, though, and nothing like the 20 or the 15.I've had people trying to convince me for years that Pappy 23 was the be-all, end-all of bourbon and that Pappy 20 was the only acceptable alternative. I think they're nuts. I find them both to be over-aged and tired. I'm a firm believer that S-W hits its stride at 12yo, peaks at 15-16 yo and quickly goes downhill...and I invite anyone to start cracking bottles of every age and label to try to prove me wrong.What they said.:pope: :pope: :pope: :pope: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Boozer Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 I've had people trying to convince me for years that Pappy 23 was the be-all, end-all of bourbon and that Pappy 20 was the only acceptable alternative. I think they're nuts. I find them both to be over-aged and tired. I'm a firm believer that S-W hits its stride at 12yo, peaks at 15-16 yo and quickly goes downhill...and I invite anyone to start cracking bottles of every age and label to try to prove me wrong.Yes, and while they may be entitled to have an opinion, that doesn't mean their opinion can't be DEAD WRONG.:cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: This one was too easy - shooting fish in a barrel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jburlowski Posted October 20, 2010 Share Posted October 20, 2010 I've had people trying to convince me for years that Pappy 23 was the be-all, end-all of bourbon and that Pappy 20 was the only acceptable alternative. I think they're nuts. I find them both to be over-aged and tired. I'm a firm believer that S-W hits its stride at 12yo, peaks at 15-16 yo and quickly goes downhill...and I invite anyone to start cracking bottles of every age and label to try to prove me wrong.I would tend to agree. I think the PVW 15 is the peak of that line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kickert Posted October 21, 2010 Share Posted October 21, 2010 I would tend to agree. I think the PVW 15 is the peak of that line.Amen and Amen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErichPryde Posted October 21, 2010 Share Posted October 21, 2010 Amen and AmenForever and ever amen! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
camduncan Posted October 21, 2010 Share Posted October 21, 2010 I've never had a Pappy I didn't like (though I like some more than others,) and think this is a deserving win. What frustrates me though is the tendancy for awards like this to go to either extremely rare or very expensive (usually both) bottles. It's unfortunate that the average bourbon drinker will never find, or likely afford to try the winners of these awards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sailor22 Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 Jeez fellas you guys really seem to have a hate thing going with the 20 and 23. While I haven't been impressed with the 23 enough to buy any I really like the bottles of Pappy 20 I have had. Some evenings it really hits the spot like few others can. When I'm ready for it I find it warm, deep, tasty and subtle. When I'm in the mood for something younger and more complex I pour a younger Bourbon.Guess my opinion is just DEAD WRONG regarding the 20, Thanks for setting me straight. Some evenings the Pappy 15 or the lot b does the job. Recently I shared a lovely few hours with a 10/107. I can't think of another line up by anyone else that I appreciate as much top to bottom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kickert Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 Jeez fellas you guys really seem to have a hate thing going with the 20 and 23. While I haven't been impressed with the 23 enough to buy any I really like the bottles of Pappy 20 I have had. Some evenings it really hits the spot like few others can. When I'm ready for it I find it warm, deep, tasty and subtle. When I'm in the mood for something younger and more complex I pour a younger Bourbon.Guess my opinion is just DEAD WRONG regarding the 20, Thanks for setting me straight. Some evenings the Pappy 15 or the lot b does the job. Recently I shared a lovely few hours with a 10/107. I can't think of another line up by anyone else that I appreciate as much top to bottom.It's like preferring a cab or a pinot. Different strokes for different folks. I don't like the woodier bourbons, while other really like it. I also tend to prefer the more subtle pinot to the tannic cab. (Since many of the woody flavors come from wood tannins... I guess we can definitely say I am not a fan of heavily tannic drinks) Although, sometimes I love a deep cab... just like sometimes I can really appreciate an 20+ year old pour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainQ Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 It's like preferring a cab or a pinot. Different strokes for different folks. I don't like the woodier bourbons, while other really like it. I also tend to prefer the more subtle pinot to the tannic cab. (Since many of the woody flavors come from wood tannins... I guess we can definitely say I am not a fan of heavily tannic drinks) Although, sometimes I love a deep cab... just like sometimes I can really appreciate an 20+ year old pour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgtgto Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 Exactly my thoughts. Ben are you a smoker? If I had to guess I would say no. Seems like smokers have distorted palettes and prefer "stronger" more assertive flavored beverages and foods. Distorted palettes? Come on now Dave The very fact that we drink bourbon neat versus drinking Canadian whiskey would say that all bourbon drinkers have a distorted palette Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CorvallisCracker Posted October 22, 2010 Share Posted October 22, 2010 I tried taking up painting a few years ago (the kind involving easel, canvas, etc), but all the paints ran together before I could even dip my brush in them, so I gave up. I later learned that I'd been using a distorted palette, so at some point I may get a flat one and try it again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spun_cookie Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 the longer I have had mine, the woodier mine has gotten... Started off like a champ, but has fadded.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts