Attempt to categorize bourbons by price

[Robmo]

While one of the more obvious ways to categorize whiskey is by price range, it's not an extremely popular subject of discussion on this board. Just personally...I often go into a liquor store with the question of "What can I get with what's in my pocket?" Or another example: recently I saw a bottle of Michter's 10 year for about US 80.00, and one of my first considerations was, "What else can I get for that much?"(Perhaps it's because I'm a relative bourbon newbie but I don't always really think, "I feel like trying another Buffalo Trace product today" or "I feel like trying another wheater today...")

I broke things down into 6 different price categories and listed the main brands/offerings that fall into each price range. One reason for doing this is that there are threads about "the best mid-shelf" etc. but participants rarely agree about the definitions of terms like mid-shelf, bottom-shelf, and so on. (Some links to past threads below). It might help discussions proceed a little more smoothly if we agreed on some terminology and used it consistently. Maybe this is useful, maybe it's useless. Your feedback is appreciated either way.

(prices are generally for a 700 or 750ml bottle.)

Bottom shelf, or Class D: Under $15.00

Old Crow, Old Grand Dad 86, EW Green label, Ancient Age, Heaven Hill, Benchmark, Old Charter, Jim Beam White, Bourbon de Luxe, TW Samuels

Upper Bottom shelf, or Class C: $16.00-$20.00

EW Black, Charter 101, Jim Beam Black, Four Roses yellow, Henry McKenna, OGD BIB

Lower mid-shelf, or Class B: $21-$35.00

Bakers, OGD 114, JTS Brown 10 year, Elijah Craig 12 yr, Old Fitzgerald 12 year, Buffalo Trace, Evan William Single Barrel, Wild Turkey 8 year 101 proof, Four Roses Black Label, Maker's Mark

Upper mid-shelf, or Class A: $36.00-55.00

Woodford Reserve, IW Harper 12 year, WT Kentucky Spirit, Rock Hill Farms, Four Roses Single Barrel, Ridgemont Reserve, Noah's Mill, Booker's, Basel Hayden, WT Rare Breed, most expressions of Blanton's

Upper shelf, Class AA, $56.00-90.00

Elijah Craig 18 yr, Michters Small Batch, Michter's 10 year,Old Forrester Birthday,Four Roses Platinum,Hirsh 20 year, Makers Mark 46, Willet 12 year 100 proof, Willet 8 year, Van Winkle 12 year (lot

Upper-upper shelf Class AAA, $91.00++

Four Roses Marriage Collection/Small Batch, Pappy Van Winkle 20/23 yr, Willet Family Reserve 17/24 yr, Parker's Heritage (all), Maker's Mark VIP, Evan Williams 23 yr, Stagg, Woodford Reserve Master's Collection, Eagle Rare 17 year, WT American Spirit

Anyway that's the list for now. You may agree or disagree with my entries just as you may like or dislike the very idea of such an attempt at categorization. For me, this is mainly an attempt at making comparisons easier.

Considerations

1) I originally started with 5 categories, the "lowest category" including everything under $20.00...but this seemed odd because, at least in my market (Japan) both Jim Beam Black and Jim Beam White end up in the same grouping. Ditto Evan Williams "black" and "green"...and so on. Therefore I divided the lower shelf category into "class E" and "class F"

2) I made an attempt at listing bourbons that are generally available across different regions and markets although I may have erred on the side of including one too many Japan-only products on the list

3) I'm sure the actual prices of the above bourbons vary by market and currency... I've tried to translate my experience in the Japanese market to the U.S. market but I'm sure I've missed the mark in some spots. Please point out where you think there are any mistakes or oversights.

4) for the simplicity's sake I limited my list to bourbons only

5) Past threads involving considerations of bourbons within a particular price range or category include these:

Category of bourbons by subjective preferences ("everyday pour"/"special occasion" etc.

http://www.straightbourbon.com/forums/showthread.php?t=9789

Discussion of 'best-value' bourbons http://www.straightbourbon.com/forums/showthread.php?t=15174&highlight=price+range

Attempt to define premium category: http://www.straightbourbon.com/forums/showthread.php?t=10998&highlight=price+category

Discussion of bottom-shelfers

http://www.straightbourbon.com/forums/showthread.php?t=15578&highlight=lower+shelf

[squire]

Rob I can't agree with any system that categorizes whisky by price because price alone does not denote quality. Some of the most expensive Bourbon/Ryes out there are labels owned by NDPs who source their whisky from a genuine producer and pass it off as their own. A fancy package and carefully crafted hype does not a first rate whisky make.

[callmeox]

The major flaw in classifying by price is what you mention in consideration 3, the variance from market to market. This makes price ranges meaningless. I have not paid over 90.00 for any single bottle of whiskey in my bunker, yet I have the majority of bottles that you list in the 91.00 category for much less.

It is a neat exercise, but you may get more use from it by localizing to Just Japan as the prices don't match my buying experiences.

[OscarV]

The last thing to be considered if it is a great, good, average or bad bourbon is the price.

Price has nothing to do with what's in the bottle.

Price is just the marketing department's final spin.

The corn in Pappy and Kentucky Tavern costs the same.

[kickert]

In a previous thread, I put forth the following as my classification for bourbons by price:

Obviously my opinion doesn't matter, but I would put value as under $15, Premium as $15-25, High end premium as $25-40 and Super premium as over $40.

[Brisko]

The last thing to be considered if it is a great, good, average or bad bourbon is the price.

Price has nothing to do with what's in the bottle.

Price is just the marketing department's final spin.

The corn in Pappy and Kentucky Tavern costs the same.

Absolutely, but if you only have $20 to spend on booze, you don't want to blow it all on [insert overpriced brand here].

I do categorize my buys both by absolute quality and with price taken into account. There are a few brands that I would buy even at 4 times their current price-- others that I tolerate because they're at that intersection of quality and price.

[squire]

Couldn't agree more Brisko, there's a quality Bourbon for any taste at less than $20.00.

[squire]

And if you are in the process of developing your taste in Bourbon four good ones can be had for the cost of one of the posers.

[Robmo]

Considerations

1) I originally started with 5 categories, the "lowest category" including everything under $20.00...but this seemed odd because, at least in my market (Japan) both Jim Beam Black and Jim Beam White end up in the same grouping. Ditto Evan Williams "black" and "green"...and so on. Therefore I divided the lower shelf category into "class E" and "class F"

[Robmo]

In a previous thread, I put forth the following as my classification for bourbons by price:

[Robmo]

The major flaw in classifying by price is what you mention in consideration 3, the variance from market to market...

It is a neat exercise, but you may get more use from it by localizing to Just Japan as the prices don't match my buying experiences.

[Robmo]

The last thing to be considered if it is a great, good, average or bad bourbon is the price.

Price has nothing to do with what's in the bottle.

Price is just the marketing department's final spin.

The corn in Pappy and Kentucky Tavern costs the same.

[squire]

Rob you've put an admirable amount of thought into this system but I suggest it is flawed due to its premise of placing brands into lettered classes separated by price.

For instance I consider Grand Dad (D class) to be at least the equal if not superior of Wofford and Basil Hayden (A class).

Perhaps a grouping by type (high rye, low rye, wheat recipe, age, proof) would be a better approach.

[squire]

Rob, I think what Oscar meant was the costs of production is about the same.

[Robmo]

Rob you've put an admirable amount of thought into this system but I suggest it is flawed due to its premise of placing brands into lettered classes separated by price.

For instance I consider Grand Dad (D class) to be at least the equal if not superior of Wofford and Basil Hayden (A class).

Perhaps a grouping by type (high rye, low rye, wheat recipe, age, proof) would be a better approach.

I fully admit the system is flawed as it stands now, but I intended it as a starting point rather than an ending point. There are many ways to 'look' at the wide range of bourbon offerings out there, and this is perhaps one, definitely not the only!

Perhaps it's those letters A,B,C, D which are most off-putting to you? If so then I can fully understand your feelings. Again, I didn't intend the letter grades to denote quality in any way, so perhaps to improve the system in the future I would scrap those letters altogether just to avoid confusion.

[squire]

Not off putting to me because I understand what you are working to accomplish. To someone new to Bourbon though I think there would be a natural association with Class A being better than Class D.

[Robmo]

Not off putting to me because I understand what you are working to accomplish. To someone new to Bourbon though I think there would be a natural association with Class A being better than Class D.

[kickert]

Here you can see an example of someone taking this discussion too far:

http://www.straightbourbon.com/forums/showthread.php?t=11465

[Robmo]

Fun.

Thanks for reminding me of that discussion, I think I had come across it a while ago and surely it unconsciously inspired me a bit here.