Josh Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 Saz exapanding again, purchasing 17 brands from Corby and "shares" in their distillery near Montreal. Article here: http://www.bizjournals.com/louisville/news/2011/09/28/sazerac-purchasing-canadian-brands.htmlThanks to Duncan Ayre for the link via twitter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jono Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 I did not realize that Corby had such an extensive portfolio of brands...and representation for Pernod Ricard:http://www.corby.ca/portfolio.php?id=27Jameson, Chivas, Glenlivet, Aberlour, Absolut, Wisers etc etc.The links and connections in the alcohol beverage industry are a maze to be sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p_elliott Posted September 30, 2011 Share Posted September 30, 2011 Ok I'm confussed I thought Jim Beam (Fortune Brands) owned De Kuyper ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Posted September 30, 2011 Author Share Posted September 30, 2011 Yeah, I was puzzled by that too. Maybe Corby owned the brand in Canada only? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowdery Posted September 30, 2011 Share Posted September 30, 2011 DeKuyper is still owned by DeKuyper in Holland. Beam has U.S. marketing rights, Sazerac now has Canadian marketing rights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p_elliott Posted October 2, 2011 Share Posted October 2, 2011 DeKuyper is still owned by DeKuyper in Holland. Beam has U.S. marketing rights, Sazerac now has Canadian marketing rights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomasH Posted October 3, 2011 Share Posted October 3, 2011 This is a good thing. Anytime you can move a brand or control away from a Diageo or Pernod Ricard type outfit is nothing but a plus for the brand and market. Neither is known for their common sense decision making. Diageo needs no explanation. Pernod Ricard was the ones that came up with the bright idea of tankering and bottling WT products in Arkanas!Thomas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p_elliott Posted October 3, 2011 Share Posted October 3, 2011 Pernod Ricard was the ones that came up with the bright idea of tankering and bottling WT products in Arkanas!ThomasI agree and for the life of me why did Campari (sp) built a $50 million distilliary and did not build a bottleing facility? Due to an out dated contract with Pernod Ricard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomasH Posted October 3, 2011 Share Posted October 3, 2011 Hopefully a bottling facility in Lawrenceburg is on the horizon!Thomas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
callmeox Posted October 3, 2011 Share Posted October 3, 2011 I agree and for the life of me why did Campari (sp) built a $50 million distilliary and did not build a bottleing facility? Due to an out dated contract with Pernod Ricard?It was probably a mutually agreed upon stipulation of the sale. Campari had one less big thing to worry about in the short term and Pernod retained work for their Arkansas facility. There's plenty of room in Lawrenceburg, so if it makes fiscal sense Campari will do it when they are able contractually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowdery Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Campari's lead brand in the U.S is Skyy Vodka, which I saw being bottled at Brown-Forman one day. Clearly, the company is very satisfied with contract bottling.Campari had no reason to void its bottling contract with Pernod, but notice that it is relatively short term. Since Wild Turkey is their only U.S. production facility (I assume), I expect they will eventually build a bottling hall at Lawrenceburg to use for all of the company's North American bottling, just as Beam has consolidated all of its North American bottling at Frankfort and Clermont. With the new distillery, Turkey is increasing production significantly but it will be years before that product will need to be bottled. I expect there will be a tipping point when it makes sense for them to do it themselves.Remember that in addition to building a building and buying bottling equipment, bottling is very labor intensive. Adding bottling at Lawrenceburg will take that facility from a few dozen employees to a few hundred. It's a big step. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts