Okie Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 Watching the history channel and a great program on moonshine vs bourbon.Love the explaination of Proofing with gunpowder and alcohol. If I only knew this when I was little my brother and I could have had some fun in my with my Dad's reloading powder and some of his Johnny Walker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrispyCritter Posted February 4, 2012 Share Posted February 4, 2012 Wouldn't the old-style gunpowder method of proofing require black powder rather than smokeless?At any rate, I remember reading somewhere that it wasn't especially accurate; 100 proof by powder was more like 57% ABV, aka 114 proof by modern methods. The 57% ABV lives on, though, in OGD 114 at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILLfarmboy Posted February 4, 2012 Share Posted February 4, 2012 Wouldn't the old-style gunpowder method of proofing require black powder rather than smokeless?I 'spect it would.And I doubt the old method is any more accurate than what an experienced hand could accomplish by judging the size and longevity of bubbles when you hit a bottle with the palm of your hand. I reckon it was more a way to prove to customers they weren't getting ripped off, sort of like the traditional worm in a bottle of mescal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shuboy Posted February 5, 2012 Share Posted February 5, 2012 Wouldn't the old-style gunpowder method of proofing require black powder rather than smokeless?At any rate, I remember reading somewhere that it wasn't especially accurate; 100 proof by powder was more like 57% ABV, aka 114 proof by modern methods. The 57% ABV lives on, though, in OGD 114 at least.Springbank 100 Proof is also 57% ABV and I believe the original British proof system was derived from that ratio. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts