Josh Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 All of the Tequila/Mezcal-oriented parts of the internet are up in arms about NOM 186, which (correct me if I'm wrong) would seem to favor large makers of Mixtos over small artisanal Mezcal producers. More info here:http://www.tequilainterchangeproject.com/stop-nom-186.htmlThoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wadewood Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 https://twitter.com/#!/Bobby_HeugelBobby Huegel, a bar owner from Houston, is at the meeting in Mexico and spoke to committee voting on this today. It was streamed on the internet. He is posting constant updates on his twitter account. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wadewood Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 http://www.ustream.tv/channel/ii-national-meeting-on-agave-distillated#utm_campaign=t.co&utm_source=11039547&utm_medium=socialstream from meeting - live now with english translation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Posted May 8, 2012 Author Share Posted May 8, 2012 Bobby's tweets have been great. Anybody with a remote interest in this should follow him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unclebunk Posted May 8, 2012 Share Posted May 8, 2012 Very interesting, indeed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Power Posted May 8, 2012 Share Posted May 8, 2012 I have no idea why anyone would be in support of this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Dog Posted May 8, 2012 Share Posted May 8, 2012 I have no idea why anyone would be in support of this. If you were a suit at Diageo, I can see why you'd support it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Power Posted May 8, 2012 Share Posted May 8, 2012 If you were a suit at Diageo, I can see why you'd support it. Yes, of course. :smiley_acbt: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wadewood Posted May 8, 2012 Share Posted May 8, 2012 I'll try to put NOM 186 in a bourbon perspective.What if all the majors (Beam, 4 Roses, Wild Turkey, Buffalo Trace, Brown Forman) got together and decided they didn't like competing with the little artisanal distilleries making other types of whiskey than bourbon. So they strong armed the US government into redefining bourbon as made from greater than 51% corn and that corn could only come from KY. Also, the corn strain had to be a particular variety. Also anyone making any whiskey outside KY with corn as grain could not call their product whiskey and they could only sell this other spirit at 70 proof lower. Then they said this was all done to protect the consumer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unclebunk Posted May 8, 2012 Share Posted May 8, 2012 I'll try to put NOM 186 in a bourbon perspective.What if all the majors (Beam, 4 Roses, Wild Turkey, Buffalo Trace, Brown Forman) got together and decided they didn't like competing with the little artisanal distilleries making other types of whiskey than bourbon. So they strong armed the US government into redefining bourbon as made from greater than 51% corn and that corn could only come from KY. Also, the corn strain had to be a particular variety. Also anyone making any whiskey outside KY with corn as grain could not call their product whiskey and they could only sell this other spirit at 70 proof lower. Then they said this was all done to protect the consumer.That about sums it up. Really, it's hard to even imagine this proposal gaining any traction at all, but when the biggies talk, government listens. (And who knows what kind of shenanigans might have gone on behind closed doors, with money exchanging hands to grease the skids for its passing. That's the Mexican way!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts