Bourbon Boiler Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Anyone tried this yet? I enjoyed the first release quite a bit.10 yr, BT Wheat mashbill, 136 proof (barrel proof), finished in Abraham Bowman Viginia Rye barrels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainQ Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 I loved the first release. Curious as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c2walker Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 I'm not prepared to give a detailed assessment, but I can say that I like it. Generally I prefer to drink barrel proof bourbons and ryes with little or any water, but this bottle is the exception. I enjoy it a lot more when it's brought down to around 100 proof. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bourbon Boiler Posted May 12, 2012 Author Share Posted May 12, 2012 I hope the fact that this is the second take at an experimental, and one that doesn't take a long time to reproduce (like a special mashbill would), means that they are leading up to a regularly running product. Maybe since TPS is building a distillery, they could purchase 8-10 yr product from BT and make this a staple of their product line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bad_scientist Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 I hope the fact that this is the second take at an experimental, and one that doesn't take a long time to reproduce (like a special mashbill would), means that they are leading up to a regularly running product. Maybe since TPS is building a distillery, they could purchase 8-10 yr product from BT and make this a staple of their product line.And cut the price in half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cigarnv Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 The heat is tough to get past on this one and I found water is not a friend.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bourbon Boiler Posted May 12, 2012 Author Share Posted May 12, 2012 And cut the price in half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jburlowski Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 First release was exceptional. The new one is not as well-balanced or integrated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cigarnv Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 First release was exceptional. The new one is not as well-balanced or integrated.John, I have gone back to this several times now given your thoughts on the first one. I know there could be some nice flavor to be found, I just can't get at it... water, air, .... nothing seems to want to bring this around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jburlowski Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 John, I have gone back to this several times now given your thoughts on the first one. I know there could be some nice flavor to be found, I just can't get at it... water, air, .... nothing seems to want to bring this around.If I still have any of the first version around, I'll bring it along the next time we get together. I think you'll see the difference between the two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cigarnv Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 If I still have any of the first version around, I'll bring it along the next time we get together. I think you'll see the difference between the two.I bet I will as I know your palate.... now the AAA, that is one sweet bottle!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts