biskuit Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 Man, I continue to be underwhelmed by these Master's Collection releases. I will say the nose on the "Four Wood" (oak, then finished in Sherry/Port/Maple) is wonderful, but then it falls apart in a wash of harsh wood. $100? Not a chance.More detailed notes if you like at http://www.thirstysouth.com/2012/11/05/woodford-reserve-four-wood/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smahoo Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 Woodford is close to jumping the shark with these 4 wood releases....they need to stick with what they do best and THIS is not it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdman1099 Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 Woodford is close to jumping the shark with these 4 wood releases....they need to stick with what they do best and THIS is not it well then, what is it they do best??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clavius Posted November 8, 2012 Share Posted November 8, 2012 well then, what is it they do best??? One word: Marketing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Dog Posted November 8, 2012 Share Posted November 8, 2012 I do like the Rye they make under contract.:cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B.B. Babington Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 I find this one to be excellent!!!! Initial standard woodford, moving to sharp bitters of wood, followed by fruity aftertaste. I've already sipped two glasses faster than normal. Good thing I bought two bottles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smahoo Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 What I meant was that I think they produce a product better suited for cocktails or mixing rather than drinking neat. To pour from a near $100.00 bottle to mix seems sacrilegious to me. It should be able to stand on its own legs as bottled and this one misses the target IMHO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B.B. Babington Posted November 20, 2012 Share Posted November 20, 2012 I hope readers appreciate sacrifices posters make to this forum. To go back and forth and back and forth between bottles to arrive at conclusions takes a lot of work! Another sacrifice to this post is doing it while watching dancing with the stars, but that's a sacrifice to spend time with my little girl. going back and forth between double wood, oak finish, maple finish, and 4 wood. conclusions. they are not for everybody. strong and bold and some would prefer smooth as water blantons. I like them!!double wood is really very good but not in same league as the others. I do prefer the double wood over standard woodford. maple is great, most bold of the bunch. a nice manly drink.4 wood is the most refined of the bunch. has the heavy hit of the woods with more panache. lots of different character that takes a while to explore and appreciate. good wood with nice florals on the after.oak still may be my favorite. maybe. tonight. or maybe the 4 wood? oak is both bold and smooth, great aftertaste. I'm going to have to try oak next to 4 wood a lot more to be sure. with only 3 bottles of each, maybe I need to get more?I think most aficionados may prefer the 4 wood. It has a lot going on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts