4R LE small batch vs PHC 2012

[trumpstylz]

Who's had both? What is your preference? I know they're different, but they're in the same price range and both brl prf, so what the hey.

[MyOldKyDram]

At first I gave a slight edge to the Parker's, but I've bought four additional bottles of the 4R SmB since that point and passed on additional PHC so...

[humchan2k]

I actually prefer the Parker's, but I understand that it is an unpopular point of view around these parts...I had both at Whisky Live LA, I had the 4R twice....but went back for the Parker's 5 times. It's an amazing bourbon.

[MyOldKyDram]

I dunno, seen a lot of love (finish notwithstanding) for the PHC around here. It really was close for me, and I will pick up another bottle of it, esp. If I see the devils cut bottling around.

[CaptainQ]

I love both of them. I give the edge to Four Roses as it's truly amazing this year.

[theglobalguy]

Parker's. To be honest, both are insanely good, but i'm not as much a fan of Four Roses spice.

[Phil T]

Im the type of buyer, that when I find something I really like, I buy multiples. I will buy more of the FR's if I find it. I have already passed on adding more of the '12 PHC.

[beAUar]

I'm a huge FR fan (currently have over a dozen expressions open) but in this case I prefer the PHC. I've got 3 bottles of the PHC 66.6% which I'll be milking longer than my 2 bottles of FR Small Batch 2012 LE.

[drunk]

It's hands down 4R for me. The PHC is interesting, but I'm still struggling to find what people love about it.

[ChainWhip]

I've got 3 bottles of the PHC 66.6% which I'll be milking longer than my 2 bottles of FR Small Batch 2012 LE.

Off-topic: do you like the PHC12 batch 2 (66.6%) better than batch 1?

[Tony]

I like them both. But I have only had one pour of the 4R so I guess I will have to visit it some more to make more of a determination.

Best regards, Tony