Gillman Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 Here is the original posting suggesting a vitamins-like taste, back on April 2, 2003:http://www.straightbourbon.com/forums/showthread.php?1557-Is-my-Dickel-bad/page4&highlight=vitaminsThe ensuing discussion was very interesting, eliciting a rare, and concurring, post from Jim Butler in March of that year!Gary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmckenzie Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 Dickel as I have said before is one of the best things on the market. I get the vitamins taste, and I like it. I think is is a combination of the high corn content in the mash way they use their charcoal. I would love to taste their white dog to see what part the charcoal adds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gillman Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 A good point Tom. I know Mike Veach has said that the distinctive estery note in JD can be tasted in the white dog. I would doubt it is created by the charcoal, as opposed to the sooty element, but who knows.Gary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SFS Posted February 2, 2013 Author Share Posted February 2, 2013 Thought I'd give an update. 35 days of air time improved this situation greatly. The nose is still overwhelmingly vitamin, plus basic "bourbon-y" aroma, but there is none of the plastic/vinyl thing going on, and no baby powder. On the palate, the vitamin taste is not nearly as prevalent as it is in the nose - what I get is mostly (simple) whiskey. It's not complex at all, and it's just the slightest bit sweet, and smooth. I finished the pour with no complaints. The vitamin thing could be a bit off putting, but it could also be something to become attached to for some folks. I don't think I will become attached to it, but I can see how it's interesting enough for some people to like it, as a smell.So I find the whisky itself is now drinkable, and I will reach for the bottle occasionally, when I want something a little different. Still don't think I would purchase another bottle, but this one will not go down the drain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gillman Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 Interesting and fair comments, thanks for this. One thing I would suggest is, try another bottle, maybe the black label. Each bottle can be different and even atypical. GD comes I believe in smaller bottles too. You may even find it useful to mingle a 200 ml or two with what you bought.Gary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ebo Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 I just bought another bottle of GD #12. I'm not the least bit confused. I always have this on hand, and it never disappoints. At $20 this stuff is one of the best value pours to be had, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 It's even better at $16.95. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SFS Posted February 3, 2013 Author Share Posted February 3, 2013 I just bought another bottle of GD #12. I'm not the least bit confused. I always have this on hand, and it never disappoints. At $20 this stuff is one of the best value pours to be had, IMO.Maybe that's part of the issue, it's $22 here, and for a couple dollars more I can get EWSB.Squire, thanks for the suggestions, but Dickel will not be getting any more of my money, regardless of the size of the bottles (or the investment). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ebo Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 Actually, I think it's the same price here, now. I like EWSB a lot, but I still think GD#12 is a great pour for the money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts