BigBoldBully Posted June 20, 2013 Share Posted June 20, 2013 I'm not an intellectual property lawyer, but I think trademarks need to be maintained in use or they are deemed lost. So reviving an old brand that infringes on a contemporary trademark would not be protected even if the old brand could have been maintained by right. Incidentally, it also would not matter if the reviver were the earlier brand's originator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowdery Posted June 20, 2013 Share Posted June 20, 2013 That makes sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Restaurant man Posted June 20, 2013 Share Posted June 20, 2013 My cock is my cock. Just because a new Cock comes along it doesn't diminish the veracity of my old cock. It's cock discrimination dammit!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts