mhatzung Posted July 10, 2014 Share Posted July 10, 2014 I have a history question for the board.I just spent some time with my brother-in-law and he was trying to find something to prove me wrong on bourbon requirements (he did a tour of Jack Daniels 2 years ago and is now an expert). He found a statement that the maximum percent of corn allowed in bourbon is 80. He was gloating some about me not knowing about the maximum:blush:.I have done some further research and found that to be a common misconception and that there is no federally mandated maximum under the current definition of bourbon.Was there an 80% maximum on corn in the federal law sometime in the past? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scratchline Posted July 10, 2014 Share Posted July 10, 2014 Discussed here:http://www.straightbourbon.com/forums/showthread.php?4609-100-Corn-Bourbon-Mixing-Mash-Bills/page2-Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mhatzung Posted July 10, 2014 Author Share Posted July 10, 2014 Thanks for the quick reply! I had already found that thread and as interesting as it is, I didn't see where the misconception came from. That's why I asked the question about it being law sometime in the past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Posted July 10, 2014 Share Posted July 10, 2014 I don't know the history of it but the basis of the misconception is, I believe, the rules for corn whiskey. Corn whiskey is required to be made with at least 80% corn, so some people assume that more than 80% turns bourbon into corn whiskey. A few micros even make 100% corn bourbons. I don't think they're very good, but they're still technically bourbons. The bigger difference between the two is cooperage not mashbill. Bourbon must be aged in new charred oak barrels but corn whiskey must not be aged in new charred oak, if it is aged at all. In other words, corn whiskey must be aged in used cooperage or none at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire Posted July 10, 2014 Share Posted July 10, 2014 The source of the misconception is the same guy who said it can't be labeled Bourbon 'les it's made in Kentucky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mhatzung Posted July 10, 2014 Author Share Posted July 10, 2014 I don't know the history of it but the basis of the misconception is, I believe, the rules for corn whiskey. Corn whiskey is required to be made with at least 80% corn, so some people assume that more than 80% turns bourbon into corn whiskey. Thanks Josh. That makes perfect sense and was an ah-ha moment for me when I read it. I knew it had to come from somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TunnelTiger Posted July 10, 2014 Share Posted July 10, 2014 The source of the misconception is the same guy who said it can't be labeled Bourbon 'les it's made in Kentucky.He should have said the only "good" Bourbon is made in Kentucky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts