why 86 proof?

[Harry in WashDC]

If 80 proof as a minimum proof for "whisky" hadn't been written into the reg (27 CFR § 5.22() for domestic labeling purposes, I'm sure we'd be looking at a lower number.

[squire]

Yes, I've seen labels from American bourbon sold in Italy from back in the 50s-60s that were 70 proof. That seems to be the lowest limit though 75 proof (37.5%) is fairly common in overseas markets.

[kickert]

Here in Southern Africa, 43% is the standard proof of spirits. I don't know why, but gins, whiskies, brandies, etc. are almost always at 43%. I wonder if it isn't a classification rule somewhere (Europe?) that sets a minimum proof and it has just carried over. I have never noticed, but next time I am in a store, I will check on staples like Jack and Jim to see where they come in at.

[ModernThirst]

+1

I wish HH would give us a 7-8 year old barrel proofer for $50, like Beam does with Booker's, and make it easily available. Dont mention ECBP, thats too old for barrel proof to me.