bourbonmed Posted February 2, 2004 Share Posted February 2, 2004 Here's an interesting article on Four Roses' efforts to go premium in the U.S. First, we all applaud Jim Rutledge's effort to bring the single barrel to Kentucky --but if Kirin wants a 'national' premium shelf presence, they are going to have to distribute it across the nation, not just KY. The article says they aren't concentrating on the 'traditional' bourbon drinker, rather they are going after the 'cocktail' crowd. If they would just put that effort and money into marketing their incredibly smooth ultra premium and single barrel offerings, they'd surely win over many of the cocktailers they are trying to recruit in the first place. And they'd take a bite of the Makers Mark and lighter whiskeys crowd. http://www.courier-journal.com/business/news2004/02/01/biz-front-roses01-8930.html Omar Edit - Edited the URL so it works Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdelling Posted February 8, 2004 Share Posted February 8, 2004 I've been thinking about "the Four Roses Challenge", and I thinkthey're actually in a pretty good position. The writer of thearticle obviously took the story and spun it so that it wouldmake good copy, but in my opinion, the situation isn't nearlythat dire.In terms of the feminine image, the answer is obvious: youradvertisements feature the Four Roses logo tatooed on amuscular arm. Voila.As to the "checkered past"... well they've got name recognition!That's often the hardest part! And who remembers what somethingtasted like so many years ago?As to "Four Roses American", the blend: they've got a uniqueopportunity here to create a top-shelf blend. Higher proofwhite-dog plus bourbon has a lot of possibilities that arereally overlooked today.I'd love to be the one doing product development and marketingfor Four Roses.Tim Dellinger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts