Jump to content

What Bourbon Are You Drinking Spring 2025?


smokinjoe

Recommended Posts

Sitting out front on a beautiful Spring day, and azaleas blooming.  It’s not overly warm, but a blazing Sun is causing my clear ice cube to melt prematurely in my glass.  So, brought out my GBS Yeti mug to keep things nice.  KC12 takes ice well, by releasing some sweetness, that gets overly covered up to me with the 12 years in oak.  

IMG_6982.jpeg

Edited by smokinjoe
  • I like it 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NICE! I love KC 12. Imo, it is the sweet spot for KC.

 

Enjoy, sir.

  • I like it 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was gifted a 375ml of WRDO.

I'm not a big fan of double-oaked whiskey, or Woodford, except for the rye & some of the Master's Series that I've tried.

That said, the cigar cuts through the sweetness and it's really working this afternoon. 

20250323_151715.jpg

  • I like it 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sipping on some HMcK10 while listening to a Spring thunderstorm.  

  • I like it 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WTRB yup that's it and it more than enough!! Awesome bourbon!!

  • I like it 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lil blend on the fly.

OGD 114

EC Toasted 

OF 100pf

 

Equal parts of the first two and a heavier pour of the OF for the mix.  I have been playing with this lately. I have a few btls of EC toasted and I am not much of a fan of it and want to make storage space. Since I always have the other two on hand and opened, it seemed like a good idea. Once I find a basic blend Ilike, I will then start to be more specific.

 

So far,  it tastes good to me. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Monday night was a re-visit to WTRB this time with a twist, this WTRB bottling is a touch more savory than what I typically associate with RB, that said, it is VERY enjoyable. I decided to blend it with a bit of Yellowstone rum finished 100p, itself a pour I enjoy on its own but vs. this particular RB, it is certainly sweeter. The combo was very tasty as well and I really enjoyed it, not better than its component parts but I enjoyed it as much. This was just for fun and not an attempt to fix anything which is what usually inspires me to blend different bourbons. Slainte!

  • I like it 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4R 2023 CA on the back deck.  Life is good!

  • I like it 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I need to go easy on the second.  MM 2023 CA. 🫣. WTH!

  • I like it 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All that OGD16 talk almost made me buy a bottle tonight. But I settled for some KC. And then got interested in why JB released the small batch collection. 1988 and 1992 seems curious to me. Couldn’t find much on competition but that move seems like a brilliant business decision. 

IMG_3678.jpeg

  • I like it 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Howdy, While working ( temporarily) far from home, this enthusiast has found Knob Creek 9 for the super- low price of only 21.99+ a paltry $1 tax. So for now, make mine Knob Creek 9.

  • I like it 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, MM818 said:

All that OGD16 talk almost made me buy a bottle tonight. But I settled for some KC. And then got interested in why JB released the small batch collection. 1988 and 1992 seems curious to me. Couldn’t find much on competition but that move seems like a brilliant business decision. 

IMG_3678.jpeg

 

Blanton's introduction in 1984 kicked off an era of launches for "premium" bourbons that played a big part in creating the bourbon boom. Booker of course had to keep up with his competitor/friend Elmer. A short history of brand/expression launches (or re-launch in the case of Four Roses):

 

1984 Blanton’s

1986 Elijah Craig

1988 Booker’s

1991 Wild Turkey Rare Breed

1992 Knob Creek

1992 Basil Hayden

1994 Wild Turkey Kentucky Spirit

1996 Woodford Reserve

1999 Buffalo Trace

2000 Buffalo Trace Antique Collection

2002 Four Roses straight bourbon re-launched in U.S.

2002 Old Forester Birthday Bourbon

2002 1792

 

Booker's existed prior to this, but was first sold commercially in 1988. The rest of the Beam small batch collection followed (apparently Baker's was first sold in 1956 and the small batch collection version launched in the "early 90s"). And we shouldn't forget that Maker's Mark launched in 1958 and always marketed itself as a premium product (perhaps not coincidentally they were one of the only American whiskey brands to do alright during the bad times), so perhaps the Samuels were really a generation ahead of everyone else.

 

 

  • I like it 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, MM818 said:

All that OGD16 talk almost made me buy a bottle tonight. But I settled for some KC. And then got interested in why JB released the small batch collection. 1988 and 1992 seems curious to me. Couldn’t find much on competition but that move seems like a brilliant business decision. 

IMG_3678.jpeg

 

Still have a case of these old-label KC SiB from a decade ago, before the KC12, 15, 18 were launched.  Age statement is 13.5 years, right in the sweet spot.  This was when we could buy 14 year old bourbon at 120pf for $50/bottle.  

  • I like it 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jazz June said:

 

Blanton's introduction in 1984 kicked off an era of launches for "premium" bourbons that played a big part in creating the bourbon boom. Booker of course had to keep up with his competitor/friend Elmer. A short history of brand/expression launches (or re-launch in the case of Four Roses):

 

1984 Blanton’s

1986 Elijah Craig

1988 Booker’s

1991 Wild Turkey Rare Breed

1992 Knob Creek

1992 Basil Hayden

1994 Wild Turkey Kentucky Spirit

1996 Woodford Reserve

1999 Buffalo Trace

2000 Buffalo Trace Antique Collection

2002 Four Roses straight bourbon re-launched in U.S.

2002 Old Forester Birthday Bourbon

2002 1792

 

Booker's existed prior to this, but was first sold commercially in 1988. The rest of the Beam small batch collection followed (apparently Baker's was first sold in 1956 and the small batch collection version launched in the "early 90s"). And we shouldn't forget that Maker's Mark launched in 1958 and always marketed itself as a premium product (perhaps not coincidentally they were one of the only American whiskey brands to do alright during the bad times), so perhaps the Samuels were really a generation ahead of everyone else.

 

 

Good stuff, Jazz!  Thanks for researching and posting that.  Your comment on Maker's is spot on, and it’s good to recognize what that brand has meant to Bourbonia’s renaissance.  Maybe, some of our younger enthusiasts have not heard of the Wall Street Journal front page article on MM, and how it lit fire under Maker’s, but also helped catapult the entire industry into the turnaround, and then boom, we have experience these past nearly 40years.  I’d like to add an article in SeriousEats, written by Reid Mitenbuler about the WSJ article and its impact.

 

https://www.seriouseats.com/history-makers-mark-bourbon-advertising-expensive#:~:text=The airline strategy also helped,today is stronger than ever.

 

 

  • I like it 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Guss West said:

 

Still have a case of these old-label KC SiB from a decade ago, before the KC12, 15, 18 were launched.  Age statement is 13.5 years, right in the sweet spot.  This was when we could buy 14 year old bourbon at 120pf for $50/bottle.  

I have one left from a case and a half. It actually also dates as a 13.5 year old. I've been seriously considering opening it on Easter - maybe I will, maybe I won't, maybe I will, maybe I won't.

I consider it one of the premiums in my stash, but also the end of an era. 😟

Decisions, decisions...

  • I like it 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, smokinjoe said:

Good stuff, Jazz!  Thanks for researching and posting that.  Your comment on Maker's is spot on, and it’s good to recognize what that brand has meant to Bourbonia’s renaissance.  Maybe, some of our younger enthusiasts have not heard of the Wall Street Journal front page article on MM, and how it lit fire under Maker’s, but also helped catapult the entire industry into the turnaround, and then boom, we have experience these past nearly 40years.  I’d like to add an article in SeriousEats, written by Reid Mitenbuler about the WSJ article and its impact.

 

https://www.seriouseats.com/history-makers-mark-bourbon-advertising-expensive#:~:text=The airline strategy also helped,today is stronger than ever.

 

 

Thanks. I did fail to identify the first release of Pappy Van Winkle in 1994 and probably some others that belong on the list, but what can you do?

 

A little corresponding history on the people that drove a lot of these releases:

 

1985 Elmer T. Lee “retires” from Buffalo Trace

1992 Booker Noe “retires” from Beam

1992 Bill Samuels, Sr. dies

2003 Lincoln Henderson retires from Brown-Forman

2004 Booker Noe dies

2005 Gary Gayheart retires from Buffalo Trace

2013 Elmer T. Lee dies

2015 Jim Rutledge retires from Four Roses

2017 Parker Beam dies

 

There are definitely some people left off this list, but that was a quick pull from the notes. Also, Jimmy and Eddie Russell are of course still running Wild Turkey. I'd guess there is some date on which Jimmy entered a "master distiller emeritus" type role, but he still seems to be there most days, so I'm not sure if that should be listed as retirement, even in quotation marks.

 

These people (and again, many I didn't list I'm sure) pushed for these releases that showcased what Kentucky bourbon can be at its best. Even the tail end of the listed time frame is before the boom really kicked in, so I'm sure it wasn't an easy sell in the board room, but these whiskeys started to elevate the reputation of bourbon to where it is today. Plus they tasted really good and made a lot of us fall in love with American whiskey.

 

 

  • I like it 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Guss West said:

 

Still have a case of these old-label KC SiB from a decade ago, before the KC12, 15, 18 were launched.  Age statement is 13.5 years, right in the sweet spot.  This was when we could buy 14 year old bourbon at 120pf for $50/bottle.  

 

Love that era of Knob Creek.  I've got several similar single barrel picks squirreled away myself.

  • I like it 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WT 101, Old Ezra 7, Nashville barrel. All good!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A while back @Galvin0791 shared some WT 101 with me. Man was it good. Better than I remembered. Not long ago, I bought a bottle of the WT 70th. I decided to change things up a bit the other night. I opened the WT 70th and had a pour. I had high expectations considering my last taste of WT 101 was so good. Sad to say, I was a bit disappointed. I did think the nose was good though. Sweet, vegetal with a slight oaky, mustiness like a rickhouse. The flavors were muddled to me, but not in a good way. Earthy, spicy, slightly soapy and a bit tannic. Not a fan. I reckon I should have bought the ps FRSB instead. 😐


IMG_6986.thumb.jpeg.a0fa898b18972a12d29184b13cda8a09.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, fishnbowljoe said:

A while back @Galvin0791 shared some WT 101 with me. Man was it good. Better than I remembered. Not long ago, I bought a bottle of the WT 70th. I decided to change things up a bit the other night. I opened the WT 70th and had a pour. I had high expectations considering my last taste of WT 101 was so good. Sad to say, I was a bit disappointed. I did think the nose was good though. Sweet, vegetal with a slight oaky, mustiness like a rickhouse. The flavors were muddled to me, but not in a good way. Earthy, spicy, slightly soapy and a bit tannic. Not a fan. I reckon I should have bought the ps FRSB instead. 😐


IMG_6986.thumb.jpeg.a0fa898b18972a12d29184b13cda8a09.jpeg

I wonder if that 101 was from the batch/s that purportedly had some 10yr as the 8yr stocks were temporarily depleted with the launch of Longbranch? I had a bottle from that batch and found it to be excellent so rumor or not I went out and stocked up. Glad I did as the new 8yr, while a welcome return of an age statement can't bode well for the now "standard" 101. Back on topic (though wrong thread!! WP10 rye SP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, kcgumbohead said:

I wonder if that 101 was from the batch/s that purportedly had some 10yr as the 8yr stocks were temporarily depleted with the launch of Longbranch? I had a bottle from that batch and found it to be excellent so rumor or not I went out and stocked up. Glad I did as the new 8yr, while a welcome return of an age statement can't bode well for the now "standard" 101. Back on topic (though wrong thread!! WP10 rye SP.

I have several bottles of those 2018 batches and they are no better than the 70th bottle IMHO.  I don't feel the 70th and regular WT101 are that far apart (even the great 2018 batches) that someone would have such varying opinions.  More likely just palate variation ("bad palate day" I call them).  YMMV...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dang!  I forgot it was a 4:00 start!  So grabbed en Evan Williams Black Label, clear cube, and the radio for some baseball on the front patio.  

IMG_6999.jpeg

  • I like it 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some Bookers Sip Awhile after dinner?

  • I like it 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1792 BiB in the glass.

O's kicked ass.

Terps & Caps on TV.

Oliva Serie V in hand.

It's a pretty good Thursday night.

20250327_204131.jpg

  • I like it 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Skinsfan1311 said:

1792 BiB in the glass.

O's kicked ass.

Terps & Caps on TV.

Oliva Serie V in hand.

It's a pretty good Thursday night.

20250327_204131.jpg

I would say so!!!  Live large!! 

  • I like it 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.