Jump to content

What Bourbon Are You Drinking Spring 2025?


smokinjoe

Recommended Posts

Prime Dry-aged Sirloin Strip cooked Pittsburgh rare on the Napoleon infrared burner with a wee dram of Booker's 2024 "The Reserves" (shared by @Anwalt in Bardstown).  A great "Derby Day" dinner!  🥳

 

 

20250503_191944.jpg

 

Typical European style, Caesar Salad followed closely behind (HONEST!!!)  🤣

 

 

Edited by GeeTen
  • I like it 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kepler said:

 

Interesting close-up photos.  Great color on both of those!  👍

Thank you. Wish I had a better set up and knowledge to use it properly. Lol

Just my phone.

 

My vision is well intended.

 

  • I like it 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jazz June said:

 

Actually, the 8-year version of the 101 is the original. They dropped the age statement domestically around 1992, but have continued to export it. This release marks its return to our shores. I have also heard that the 70th Anniversary is a step up from this 8/101, but I have yet to crack mine to form my own opinion.

 

 

Good to know sir.  I was drinking Ten High and coke back then. Not good for anyone. Kept me from brown water for a long time.

  • I like it 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife and granddaughter went out shopping today after my granddaughters soccer game this morning. They went to a number of places looking for prom items and other things. At one vendor/antique mall, they even found something for me. I named him BT. Baby Thunder. Some of y’all will know. 😉 So, I’m having a pour or two of BT this evening. Cheers!  🦬  🙂

 

IMG_7241.thumb.jpeg.5733692b1bde30990de798e2573f2ae6.jpeg

  • I like it 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, kcgumbohead said:

WTRB was a fitting Derby day pour and thoroughly enjoyed!!

That sounds like an excellent idea!  I will join you, to your health sir.🥃

  • I like it 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This evening it's a generous pour of OF 1920. I'm a huge fan of the OF flavor profile. I think the only bottle I'm not a fan of is the 1897. I'm not sure why.

  • I like it 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/1/2025 at 8:21 PM, MSB said:

Called in a couple birds. They were fighting for my attention so I took a shot at both of them. 

 

20250501_204755.thumb.jpg.5a1d098b51fbfdb8a24bd6c27472b246.jpg

 

For the nose, i give the 70th the win by a beak.

 

The palate, The 70th wins with a better beard and wattle.

 

The finish, you prolly guessed it, The 70th wins by the snood and tail coverts.

 

Obviously the winner is the 70th and I give it 18 tail feathers.

 

Seeing how the 70th is basically gone, I will grab a btl or 2 of the 8yr when i find it. Would like to do a sbs with WTKS and the 70th, maybe next time I'm at the bar.

 

Then I would like to do a sbs with The Original Kicking Chicken (WT 101) and the 8yr. Note to self, I prolly should do that before I buy the 8yr. 🤔 

I did a blind of these and I think I prefer the 8 year. The 70th is more textbook, but the 8 has a cinnamon finish and seems more playful. Cheers!

 

 

IMG_2356.jpeg

  • I like it 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, WhiskeyMaier7 said:

I did a blind of these and I think I prefer the 8 year. The 70th is more textbook, but the 8 has a cinnamon finish and seems more playful. Cheers!

 

 

IMG_2356.jpeg


Nice sbs.

Looking forward to trying the new 8 someday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, WhiskeyMaier7 said:

I did a blind of these and I think I prefer the 8 year. The 70th is more textbook, but the 8 has a cinnamon finish and seems more playful. Cheers!

 

 

IMG_2356.jpeg

A blind sbs is the way to go! ( hindsight, i should have done that at the bar)

 

Great to hear your input.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some  good old WT 101 by the fire, 
waiting for the fire to get right on for some ribeyes
IMG_0389.thumb.jpeg.6f0d552df4b02668a2878f11dbf6181a.jpegu

  • I like it 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, WhiskeyMaier7 said:

I did a blind of these and I think I prefer the 8 year. The 70th is more textbook, but the 8 has a cinnamon finish and seems more playful. Cheers!

 

 "a cinnamon finish and seems more playful"

 

Playful .... care to elaborate?  Sounds like the finish on the WT8 kinda just draws you in for another pour? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I took a ribeye and made some steak fajitas and elote for Cinco de Mayo and my wife’s birthday.  I was sipping on some MMCS while the steak, veggies and corn grilled.

  • I like it 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LCWoody said:

Some  good old WT 101 by the fire, 
waiting for the fire to get right on for some ribeyes
IMG_0389.thumb.jpeg.6f0d552df4b02668a2878f11dbf6181a.jpegu

Now we are talking... Ribeyes. Fabulous

  • I like it 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I am at the bar again and wanted to do a blind sbs with The 70th and 8yr. For whatever reason the 8yr is in hiding and was not available tonight. So I decided to do a blind sbs with the 70th and WTKS.

20250505_175954.thumb.jpg.afcaf9ce756e94fab1f0d9f91cc78060.jpg

for some reason i am unable to upload the pic of the pours. No biggie. 

please forgive me for my basic interpretation of the tasting i have done.

 

Palate taste review only.

 

A.

I get floral notes. Buttery notes. A cross between red and white fruit. Smooth oily texture and a long finish. No to very lil ethanol burn.

 

B. No to lil ethanol burn. Maybe some apple flavor. Buttery.  Some flavors that came and went that were very delicious.  Wish i could grasp and verbalize those. Smooth and oily long finish.

 

Both  were very good to great pours.

I chose correctly on which was which, but could I do that again, idk??. 

I would be happy with either one of these pours on any given day.  I really enjoyed them.

 

I would go with B. And B is the WTKS.

 

SO much going on in every sip. All the extra nuances in it make it very good and complex to differentiate the flavors going on in this pour. This is a pour to sit and sip and savor. 

  • I like it 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NEXT UP. 

 

20250505_193553.thumb.jpg.82c63f2444ddf1972e6c61186551959a.jpg

 

A pair of champions. There has been some discussion about these two on SB lately. I have my opinions and others have theirs. NOBODY RIGHT AND NOBODY WRONG. Just varying palates, experiences and the result of that is varying opinions. It is ALL GOOD.

 

This will be a short and sweet tasting comparison. 

 

Both are excellent pours. Obviously similar in so many ways but maybe more pronounced in one pour than the other in almost as many ways???? ( hope that makes sense)

 

 These are awesome! I can find no fault in either one of them. Great flavor in the beginning , middle and finish.

I knew which was which.  (A) had more oak flavor and (B) seemed a lil sweeter. A is 18 and B is 12. 

 

NOOO, I was soo wrong. I am amazed that I got it wrong and even more amazed how I MIGHT BE A 18YR WHORE NOW!  LOL

 

The 18yr tonight is the tops! So good and hitting all the right notes. I am so disappointed in myself and sadened that my wallet and bank account will be dwindling faster than anticipated. I love both these btls and will enjoy them everytime I get one but I will be looking for more 18yr in my future.  I will not be happy with paying the $160+, but I can not wait to sip on it again. 

 

Thanks SB'ers for inadvertently pushing me to this blind tasting. I have done sbs with these two before but not blind and I was the one doing the pouring and I MIGHT have been a lil bias. 

 

Gotta love the blind tasting.

  • I like it 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 The result of the blind. 12yr is A and 18yr B.image.thumb.jpeg.91a072803cb1ac48a030b78e4c402333.jpeg

Edited by MSB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, MSB said:

NEXT UP. 

 

20250505_193553.thumb.jpg.82c63f2444ddf1972e6c61186551959a.jpg

 

A pair of champions. There has been some discussion about these two on SB lately. I have my opinions and others have theirs. NOBODY RIGHT AND NOBODY WRONG. Just varying palates, experiences and the result of that is varying opinions. It is ALL GOOD.

 

This will be a short and sweet tasting comparison. 

 

Both are excellent pours. Obviously similar in so many ways but maybe more pronounced in one pour than the other in almost as many ways???? ( hope that makes sense)

 

 These are awesome! I can find no fault in either one of them. Great flavor in the beginning , middle and finish.

I knew which was which.  (A) had more oak flavor and (B) seemed a lil sweeter. A is 18 and B is 12. 

 

NOOO, I was soo wrong. I am amazed that I got it wrong and even more amazed how I MIGHT BE A 18YR WHORE NOW!  LOL

 

The 18yr tonight is the tops! So good and hitting all the right notes. I am so disappointed in myself and sadened that my wallet and bank account will be dwindling faster than anticipated. I love both these btls and will enjoy them everytime I get one but I will be looking for more 18yr in my future.  I will not be happy with paying the $160+, but I can not wait to sip on it again. 

 

Thanks SB'ers for inadvertently pushing me to this blind tasting. I have done sbs with these two before but not blind and I was the one doing the pouring and I MIGHT have been a lil bias. 

 

Gotta love the blind tasting.

 

Blind tasting results can be wild (we've all been there).  Having said that, I'm not totally surprised ... because that KC18 is LEGIT.  The balance it has for an 18 year bourbon is amazing and quite rare.  I don't think Beam gets near enough love for how they hit the KC18 out of the ballpark.  It's special.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.