ebo Posted Saturday at 08:23 PM Share Posted Saturday at 08:23 PM 1 hour ago, Anwalt said: Those are outright good, and especially good for the money. BBC did it right and waited for the 6 years. I presently favor the rye. I haven't had the rye yet. That will be the next one I try. I'm really liking the black label BiB. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richnimrod Posted Saturday at 08:49 PM Share Posted Saturday at 08:49 PM I 'switched' to a half-full bottle of Rebel, Cask Strength, SB (120-pr.) in an effort to drink some low-fill bottles down. I certainly couldn't 'drink it down' today; but I did put a dent in it. It's not a really complex pour; but, it is one of the 'sweetest' Bourbons I can ever remember tasting. It's quite nice over a cube, or even neat. I had two pours. One neat and a bigger pour over a cube. That was "more than enough", if ya' know what I mean. I'll work on this one for the next week or two. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kepler Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago Doing a Sbs of a couple of different Maker's Mark Private Select picks. Sometimes MM just hits the spot perfectly. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishnbowljoe Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago We took a 45 minute drive today to see the buffalo at Nachusa Grasslands. We were in luck. The buffalo were out in the open for a change! So, guess what I'm drinking tonight ? 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kepler Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago Started the evening with Maker's Mark PS. Then went to EW12, taking inspiration from @NDN98 's post. Good idea, as that was fantastic. Now unwinding with good old simple HH6BiB. Happy Memorial Day weekend to all you SB'ers. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kepler Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago 18 hours ago, aquavite said: Well, let's put it this way. In January 2025, the only ECBP available that I saw was A124 and only at ABC Wine & Spirits, here in Tampa Bay, I did get one. But no other stores had B524 or C924, or any ECBP whatsoever. I get the feeling that, perhaps, these retailers don't want to participate in all the "hype" regarding these things and just get the easiest, cheapest thing (the "A" batches, if any ECBP) thinking that people won't know the difference and just buy what they present to them. Even the Elijah Craig website itself will ship it to you, but they don't guarantee the batch you will get. I guess I'll have to look harder. In your experience, will stores who have the better batches be willing to ship it to on-line customers, or is it reserved for "in store" customers? How many different stores did you actually try? Did you try any small local "Mom & pop" stores? Your experience seems like common experiences when folks only shop at the "big box" retailers ... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aquavite Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 12 hours ago, Kepler said: How many different stores did you actually try? Did you try any small local "Mom & pop" stores? Your experience seems like common experiences when folks only shop at the "big box" retailers ... I've tried quite a few of them. All of the local stores in my area.. I'd have to venture out a bit farther to my county/region. A bit difficult as I don't own a car, right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aquavite Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago On 5/24/2025 at 1:42 PM, Richnimrod said: FWIW, I haven't found that much difference among the (very) many ECBP's I've owned. Now that's not to say there isn't some variation. There absolutely is! A couple of the early ones were pretty 'hot'. But over the next number of years (I stopped seeking it out after about 2021 or '22) I found none that were poor in comparison to other brands or to each other. Now, here again, I have little experience with those batches after '22. A taste here and there is all. But, I'd say the profile hasn't been that variable in any meaningful way. I don't think one could assume every "A" batch would be 'only OK', while some other batch from later in the year would always be 'better'. Take this with as many grains of salt required of course, as any persons palate will be different from anyone elses. So, even though the B or C batches appear to be aged longer and are at marginally higher proofs, all of that doesn't make much difference when it comes to ECBP's? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anwalt Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago Loving the 15y - `7y Hardins Creeks. Beam aged goodness. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markandrex Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago Rainy and cool in the Bluegrass today, pour some Mck10 to kick off the evening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiskeyMaier7 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 19 hours ago, fishnbowljoe said: We took a 45 minute drive today to see the buffalo at Nachusa Grasslands. We were in luck. The buffalo were out in the open for a change! So, guess what I'm drinking tonight ? Old elk!? Cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markandrex Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago I decided to move on to some Lot B after dinner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richnimrod Posted 25 minutes ago Share Posted 25 minutes ago 5 hours ago, aquavite said: So, even though the B or C batches appear to be aged longer and are at marginally higher proofs, all of that doesn't make much difference when it comes to ECBP's? In my experience, it's more random than you seem to suggest. ...Or, maybe I just never paid that much attention to the proofs. ...And, the age had always been twelve years, I thought. In any case, I think trying to predict whether you'll like a particular edition of ECBP has to be more of 'taste-first-and-decide' than trying to predict from past years "order" of them. Even if they have been older or higher proof in a given year's later editions than the 'earlier' one. This is based upon only my admittedly poor old memory, so there's that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now