fishnbowljoe Posted Monday at 07:58 PM Share Posted Monday at 07:58 PM Much thanks to @Kepler and @Galvin0791 for the heads up about this.  https://www.foodandwine.com/eh-taylor-bottled-in-bond-buffalo-trace-antique-collection-2025-11727871   2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kepler Posted Monday at 09:39 PM Share Posted Monday at 09:39 PM Thanks for posting that Joe. Â Attaching the alleged labels 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kepler Posted Monday at 09:42 PM Share Posted Monday at 09:42 PM (edited) Since we know it will be 100 proof, the million dollar question is: What's the age going to be? They already have Eagle Rare with the same mashbill boasting 101 proof at 17 years. So I'm gonna guess 10-12 years for the CEHT in order to differentiate it.    Edited Monday at 09:43 PM by Kepler 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LW25 Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago I wonder if this will be a rebranding of the previous 18 yr Marriage? We've got ER17 and Saz 18 already so that age range is already proven for BT products. But you could say it is already represented and they don't want half the new BTAC line to be the same age, so probably more likely we'll get something in the 12-14 yr range. And I say "we'll get..." as if this wont be another unobtanium bottle   Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kepler Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago 24 minutes ago, LW25 said: I wonder if this will be a rebranding of the previous 18 yr Marriage? We've got ER17 and Saz 18 already so that age range is already proven for BT products. But you could say it is already represented and they don't want half the new BTAC line to be the same age, so probably more likely we'll get something in the 12-14 yr range. And I say "we'll get..." as if this wont be another unobtanium bottle    Do you know what the mash bill was for that 18 year Marriage? I didn't have a bottle of that one and not sure. If it's BT mashbill #1 then an 18 year makes no sense, because that is the mashbill for ER17. That's why I'm guessing an age statement in the middle range (say 10-12 yr) ... something that is not hyper-aged like ER17 but yet significantly older than regular CEHT. They could also make the new EH Taylor BTAC bottle something that varies year to year (or even experimental like some CEHT special releases have been) just to keep the taters sufficiently in a constant frenzy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LW25 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 11 hours ago, Kepler said:  Do you know what the mash bill was for that 18 year Marriage? I didn't have a bottle of that one and not sure. If it's BT mashbill #1 then an 18 year makes no sense, because that is the mashbill for ER17. That's why I'm guessing an age statement in the middle range (say 10-12 yr) ... something that is not hyper-aged like ER17 but yet significantly older than regular CEHT. They could also make the new EH Taylor BTAC bottle something that varies year to year (or even experimental like some CEHT special releases have been) just to keep the taters sufficiently in a constant frenzy. I've read before that the 18 yr Marriage is a blend from 3 different Mashbills. I would assume that means MB 1, MB 2, and the Wheated Mashbill from the Weller/Pappy line, but I figure they have a plethora of experimental mashbills so maybe it's some other combination of three.  I hadn't considered that it might be a rotational or varying release...that could be an interesting twist.  It could be as you suggested, ~10 yr to 12 yr old and BiB, so kind of like BT's version of Old Forester 1924. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now