rzelinka Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago I would submit we should prepare to see many of our favorite bourbons, whiskeys move towards a 700ml bottle versus the 750ml bottle. I see this happening more and more these days. Woodford Reserve and Jack Daniels have done so with their higher end or aged offerings. At the same time, if bottles find their way to the European market, they have to be no more than 700ml. Now if the price comes down with it, so be it, but I don't expect to see this. This trend happens with other things too. Potato Chips, and Cereal brands have been doing this for years. Reducing the size of the offering but keeping the price the same. Just a sign of the times I suppose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markandrex Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago “Shrinkflation “ - getting less for more. Not having to have a variable/two bottling lines makes sense. I understand it, I just don’t like it. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fosmith Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago If they would hang a 50ml 'airplane bottle' from the neck of a 700ml bottle, I would be perfectly happy with that. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishnbowljoe Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago As y‘all know, most domestic bottles are 750 ml, and most export bottles are 700 ml. About the only thing that is consistent between the two bottle sizes is the distillate that goes in them. A change in bottle size means a different label, changes to the bottling line, and different packaging. IIRC, part of the thought going in to a possible change over to 700 ml bottles is savings of time and money. One bottle, one label, one box. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richnimrod Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago 56 minutes ago, fishnbowljoe said: As y‘all know, most domestic bottles are 750 ml, and most export bottles are 700 ml. About the only thing that is consistent between the two bottle sizes is the distillate that goes in them. A change in bottle size means a different label, changes to the bottling line, and different packaging. IIRC, part of the thought going in to a possible change over to 700 ml bottles is savings of time and money. One bottle, one label, one box. Yup! Makes perfect sense. When bottling a brand that is marketed in the US as well as abroad, a distiller/NDP, etc. would realize a significant saving over time when using 'universal' materials; bottles, labels, tooling on the bottling line, over-pack (cartons, etc.). I don't blame our Bourbon producers for making this transition. I also, can't imagine that they haven't noted they'll be selling a somewhat smaller quantity; but, will almost certainly NOT adjust the price downward to compensate consumers for this difference. Why? ...When many consumers won't even notice, and those that do won't really have a choice, if their brand isn't available in 750's any longer. ...Other than going for the "family sized" jugs, if their brand offers that option. I'm actually a little bit surprised that this hasn't happened sooner. OTH, with the 'tariff' issue possibly having some impact on export decisions, there may be a reason to delay such a transition for a time. ???Who can say? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishnbowljoe Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago 46 minutes ago, Richnimrod said: I also, can't imagine that they haven't noted they'll be selling a somewhat smaller quantity; but, will almost certainly NOT adjust the price downward to compensate consumers for this difference. Why? ...When many consumers won't even notice, and those that do won't really have a choice, if their brand isn't available in 750's any longer. ... I wish I could find the old article where I read about the possible conversion to 700 ml bottles. Another thing that was discussed was that while there wouldn’t be a reduction in price, there could be at least some cost savings to consumers in the future. Less price adjustments for at least a little while. Six of one, half dozen of another. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokinjoe Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago This is a nonissue for me. It will just wash through the markets in a matter of a few months. It’s a little less than a 7% reduction in volume, which on a $25 dollar of whiskey, would equate to an ~$1.70 reduction in pricing if played straight up. If I currently go to 15 nearby package stores, I’ll see that much, or more, variance between pricing on the same item from each store. For me personally, the differential has to be much more pronounced to impact my decision making. And, since there is the 3 tier system in alcoholic beverages, who is to say that the producer would be the sole beneficiary of the “shrinkflation” potential. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flahute Posted 10 hours ago Share Posted 10 hours ago 8 hours ago, fosmith said: If they would hang a 50ml 'airplane bottle' from the neck of a 700ml bottle, I would be perfectly happy with that. This! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richnimrod Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago I'm not too upset about the small 'cash penalty', if the distilleries "bend us over" on this deal. It's the lack of lubrication that irritates..... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now