1792 15yr

[flahute]

I am here for 15 year old Barton. 
The 14, 15, and 16 year old Calumets were all excellent. Now of course we need to see the price. 
 

[Richnimrod]

If aged carefully enough it could be stellar... BUT, 15-years is a very long time in wood.   For now, I'll keep good thoughts regarding its profile.   ...And, its suggested retail price.

Any feel for when it might be available?  ...And/or where?

[0895]

Darn it.

The only thing I’ve ever collected a sealed bottle of every release of is 1792.

 

It’s been a nice break from chasing those down the past few years.

Now I have work to do again…

[flahute]

1 hour ago, Richnimrod said:

If aged carefully enough it could be stellar... BUT, 15-years is a very long time in wood.   For now, I'll keep good thoughts regarding its profile.   ...And, its suggested retail price.

Any feel for when it might be available?  ...And/or where?

Yes, but, as I said the 14, 15, and 16yr Calumets, which are Barton, were indeed stellar. They know what they are doing.

[NDN98]

Im intrigued.  Does anyone know if the Calumets are the same mash bill as 1792 (if they are indeed Barton products)?    I tend to get a lot of ethanol off 1792 products, especially the Full Proof, but I didn't get any of that with the older Calumet releases.   Im guessing if they are the same mash bill, that the age helped with the ethanol smell and taste I usually picked up in the Full Proof, but they could be totally different mash bills too.

Edited 5 hours ago by NDN98

[flahute]

22 minutes ago, NDN98 said:

Im intrigued.  Does anyone know if the Calumets are the same mash bill as 1792 (if they are indeed Barton products)?    I tend to get a lot of ethanol off 1792 products, especially the Full Proof, but I didn't get any of that with the older Calumet releases.   Im guessing if they are the same mash bill, that the age helped with the ethanol smell and taste I usually picked up in the Full Proof, but they could be totally different mash bills too.

Yes they are Barton.