Gillman Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 Buffalo Trace: Clean, rich, fine-flavored whiskeys, a "city" distillery in this sense: signature whiskey: Elmer T. LeeHeaven Hill: Exhuberant, feisty, full-flavored whiskeys: a "country" distillery in the best sense - signature whiskey, McKenna 10 year old SB, Rittenhouse BIB or EWSB.Beam Brands - mass production house achieving good but not great flavors. Signature: Beam Black or Knob Creek in the premium end.Four Roses: elegant, balanced whiskies with the fruitiness that characterised most bourbon way back when. Signature: FRSB.Barton Brands: a solid performer whose whiskies are not elegant or fine-flavored but full of taste and traditional character. Also, a house that offers fine value. Signature: VOB (any proof over 80).Wild Turkey: also not an elegant style but tending towards big jousting flavors of wood, char, corn and rye. Even the premium end shows these qualities, in a richer interpretation. Signature: WT 101 and some would say Rare Breed.Maker's Mark: a maker of wheated bourbon whiskey which pleases many due to its gentleness. A good introductory whiskey or for those who like its mildness, and a standby in restaurants when choice is restricted. Signature: there is only one.Brown-Forman: whiskeys which accent the floral element. Signature: OF 100 proof.Comments?Gary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black85L98 Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 By signature you mean best representation of the brand or the brands best bourbon? Great idea by the way.Many will disagree, and perhaps it is because I approach with caution, but I find Old Granddad 114 smoother than Makers. I think Makers needs a little longer in the barrel. I’m sure I am the exception. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gillman Posted August 29, 2006 Author Share Posted August 29, 2006 Both senses are valid: what is both typical of the distillery and its best product? This would exclude for HH, say, EC 18 year old which is admired by many (not all) but surely is not typical of the range.Gary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black85L98 Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 Or for me HH would be EC12YO while many hate it. Best in keeping with brand is EWSB.Oh and for BT I would go with ETL SB or Blantons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wku88 Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 As much as I like MM, I agree with Black that it could stand a little more barrel time.For HH, I think Very Rare Old HH 10 YO BIB is a better whiskey than EWSB. I can understand the oversight, as it is only available in KY, I believe.And the folks in Clermont's best whiskey is the Black Label. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black85L98 Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 Regular EW BIB is good stuff, I bet 10YO HH is very nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ratcheer Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 By signature you mean best representation of the brand or the brands best bourbon? Great idea by the way.Many will disagree, and perhaps it is because I approach with caution, but I find Old Granddad 114 smoother than Makers. I think Makers needs a little longer in the barrel. I’m sure I am the exception.You're not the only one. I don't understand it, but to me, Makers is harsh (and I've said it before).Tim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black85L98 Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 I like Makers and it was my first step up from JB Black if you consider it better than WT 101, I guess I don't. Makers would be a real good $13 whiskey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pabourbongal Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 Black,You are the second person today to inspire me to try OGD 114. Maker's Mark was one of the first bourbon's I tried, and I really didn't care for it. This surprised the heck out of my husband, who thought its mildness would be a good "chic bourbon". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SBOmarc Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 I like Makers and it was my first step up from JB Black if you consider it better than WT 101, I guess I don't. Makers would be a real good $13 whiskey.I drink all 3 of those and to me it doesn't need to a case of better or worse, just different. Not sure Bill Samuels would agree with the price point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowdery Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 Keep going, Gary. I think it's fair to include Woodford as a separate distillery. Although there is BF whiskey in WR, there is no Woodford whiskey in Old Forester.Also, Daniel's, Dickel and Virginia Gentleman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneCubeOnly Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 Gary--I'd say your summaries are dead-on, with the exception of BT. I don't believe ETL would be their signature whiskey. If you're going for their high-end offering that is most representative of the distillery, I believe Blanton's better represents their lineup.But their namesake Buffalo Trace standard bottling is probably the most taste-centric of all, and I'd even argue it's a premium in midshelf's clothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black85L98 Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 Black,You are the second person today to inspire me to try OGD 114. Maker's Mark was one of the first bourbon's I tried, and I really didn't care for it. This surprised the heck out of my husband, who thought its mildness would be a good "chic bourbon".OGD 114 is warm, but smooth. I think it;s all about what you like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TNbourbon Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 I'll take a shot:Buffalo Trace -- fruit over spice, 'wry' over rye? Eponymous Buffalo Trace would be their quintessential pour if more widely available. Could it be, in practice, Ancient Age, or AAA?Heaven Hill -- Motto: Millions are enough! Thank God for family. Stockholders would ruin this company's value-priced lineup. Evan Williams Black Label sells like the Dickens in our store.Beam Brands -- Do we make good money, or do we make good whiskey? The anti-HH. Okay, I understand it. JB Black shows they could be like Heaven Hill if that was their profile.Four Roses -- the best whiskey you've never had. Any era, any style, a Four Roses label will stoke your curiosity. The Single Barrel is today's tease.Barton Brands -- The corporate version of Heaven Hill. Remember that Ridgemont barrel sample, folks? These guys make superb whiskey! Then they dilute it in lesser labels in order to improve them. And sell a lot of it. The 1792 is they best they bottle, not the best they make, alas.Wild Turkey -- Wild card! I suspect this label will wilt when Jimmy retires. I hope it is not so. But the 'in-your-face' attitude of WT products is the antithesis of what the 'suits' are looking for these days. Without Jimmy's authority behind production, the suits will win (they always do!). The bourbon will lose. Russell's Reserve 90 may be the most meaningful.Maker's Mark -- Do you know that MM raises its prices every time Jack Daniel's does? They want to be in the same 'premium' niche -- overpriced young whiskey that people can't get enough of. Jeesh! Great work if you can find it. Looks like life-time bachelor Jack Daniel finally got caught by the Redhead.Brown-Forman -- Who are these guys? They can sell mediocre product gussied up as JD or Woodford Reserve (we won't even mention Early Times!), but have to celebrate a Birthday or create a Signature to get folks to notice the star of their lineup. Then they double the price. Seek out the old labels, folks -- save some money AND a fine whiskey tradition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gillman Posted August 29, 2006 Author Share Posted August 29, 2006 Hard to beat Tim's poetry!I agree with Gary that ETL might be slightly off-center for BT, Blanton, which is an elegant and balanced whiskey, may be the best representative and to me is a premier "city" whiskey - ETL may be its surburban cousin (stockbroker belt!). BT (the brand) is good but needs more time to establish itself I would say.Chuck is right of course, there are others I did not include. I intentionally excluded WR because it does not seem to me a signature of B-F (not in the sense I meant of both quality and house style). However different whiskeys have emerged from Versailles so I'll include it below.I excluded JD and Dickel because they are not bourbon, but will include them following Chuck's suggestion (see below).In truth I forgot about Virginia Gentleman, however since it is essentially a product now of a Kentucky distillery (Buffalo Trace) with some processing in Virginia, I think I can omit that one because while a BT emanation it is not a signature of BT. Here are the additions:Woodford Reserve Distillery: Different styles have emerged: all B-F Louisville production aged at Versailles, a 4-grain all-pot still that was, um, interesting, and the current WR which marries all-pot still and some Louisville-distilled whiskey. Signature is the current WR with its coppery and flowery notes.Jack Daniels: Charcoal filtering before barreling is its distinguishing feature. Of the different iterations, the Old No. 7 is the classic: out there with its anise and frank distillery notes. A classic for mixing with cola where it comes into its own.Goerge Dickel: Good lighter-styled whiskey with an interesting "vitamins"-like taste. The Old No. 12 is the signature with its dry, smooth interpretation. Gary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cas Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 Goerge Dickel: Good lighter-styled whiskey with an interesting "vitamins"-like taste. The Old No. 12 is the signature with its dry, smooth interpretation. GaryThe "vitamins"-like certainly captures my impression very accurately. A very peculiar after-taste that hampers my enjoyment of this whiskey.Craig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OscarV Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 Tim, Yeah you are right about Maker's and J Daniels, great line. And I hope and pray you are wrong about the future of Wild Turkey. Oscar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ratcheer Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 Gary--I'd say your summaries are dead-on, with the exception of BT. I don't believe ETL would be their signature whiskey. If you're going for their high-end offering that is most representative of the distillery, I believe Blanton's better represents their lineup.But their namesake Buffalo Trace standard bottling is probably the most taste-centric of all, and I'd even argue it's a premium in midshelf's clothing.Well, I would say you would have to choose one from each mash bill they use. Buffalo Trace and Blanton's would serve, nicely.Tim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrispyCritter Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 Van Winkle: superbly crafted whiskeys that show (a) wheaters can be a lot more interesting than they're given credit for, and ( well-aged and cared-for rye is awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jburlowski Posted August 31, 2006 Share Posted August 31, 2006 Van Winkle: superbly crafted whiskeys....quote]... from people who love to drink well crafted whiskey."I may be giving Julian (and associates) more credit than they desrve but I don't think so. The Van Winkle pours are uniformly very good to great. I like / love some better than others but have never been disappointed or feel that I didn't get (more than) my money's worth from any of their offerings. Always an outstanding value!This is high praise in today's over-hyped, promise a lot and deliver less, world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlashPuppy Posted September 1, 2006 Share Posted September 1, 2006 I think that Tim pretty much summed it up. Couldn't agree more.Jeremy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bamber Posted September 1, 2006 Share Posted September 1, 2006 Buffalo Trace: Ultra clean and fruity. Classy.Heaven Hill: Big with borderline organics. Great value.Beam Brands - Not my thing. Vegetables / feinty, LiqoriceFour Roses: Refined fruity but a little thinBarton Brands: Don't know.Wild Turkey: Massive. Honey. I love their current line up. My parents often buy me a bottle of the 8yo as a gift. Their are days when nothing else will do.Maker's Mark: Nice. Easy. Light. Clean and well made.Brown-Forman: Don't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gillman Posted September 1, 2006 Author Share Posted September 1, 2006 Good summary Bamber! I view WT differently but understand its appeal to many.Gary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bamber Posted September 4, 2006 Share Posted September 4, 2006 Thanks Gary - nice thread idea by the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gillman Posted September 4, 2006 Author Share Posted September 4, 2006 Thanks and I should add, of the WT range, I like Rare Breed the most and some bottles are really good. The blending of different ages seems to bring out the best in the house taste.Gary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts