Brennan77 Posted October 11, 2007 Share Posted October 11, 2007 Has anyone else noticed something missing on the latest bottling? There is no "12 year old" statement. The whiskey is still unique and delicious with that nutty spiced quality and is a great value. I'm just looking for insight. Has the whiskey changed? Was it erroneously labeled to begin with? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowdery Posted October 11, 2007 Share Posted October 11, 2007 As supplies have tightened, non-distiller producers like the bottlers of Rowan's Creek have had trouble sourcing the whiskey they need. The stuff sold as a 12-year-old probably was labeled correctly, but they couldn't sustain it as a 12-year-old so rather than state a lower age, they just went NAS. Happily, according to your testimony, it's still good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brennan77 Posted October 12, 2007 Author Share Posted October 12, 2007 As supplies have tightened, non-distiller producers like the bottlers of Rowan's Creek have had trouble sourcing the whiskey they need. The stuff sold as a 12-year-old probably was labeled correctly, but they couldn't sustain it as a 12-year-old so rather than state a lower age, they just went NAS. Happily, according to your testimony, it's still good.That's the most reasonable explanation. I'll side by side them sometime soon, possibly this Saturday to get an idea of differences in the end result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts