Dave_in_Canada Posted November 20, 2003 Share Posted November 20, 2003 There have been a number of posts over the last few months which have prompted my post here. When mentioning JD or Dickel, some members are corrected with the statement that TN whiskey is not a bourbon.I understand that alot of SB.com members are seriously committed to bourbon, and upholding it's merit. But I'd like to seriously ask the question: technically, isn't TN whiskey a bourbon? Of course, bourbon can be made in Tennessee, as in any other state. But the two TN whiskeys currently on the market have chosen to be labelled TN whiskey (due to their production style, state of manufacture, etc.). Doesn't the spirit in the bottle adhere to the true legal definition of bourbon?When I'm in a liquor store or bar, and ask for their bourbon selection, I too am somewhat put-0ff when offered a JD. But is that wrong?The attempts by TN distillers to make their product distinctive through this use of terminology seems to have worked with the JD brand, but I'm not convinced the marketplace chooses JD over any other because it IS or ISN'T a bourbon, (or a TN whiskey for that matter). Is it simply a case of jealosy on the part of bourbon lovers that JD (ie. the swill in the bottle) has done so well?Comments welcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeff Posted November 20, 2003 Share Posted November 20, 2003 Dave, TN Whiskies would be bourbons if not for the "Lincoln County Process" of filtering the whisky through large vats of sugar maple charcoal. This is a process which mellows the whisky and imparts flavors from the wood into it. Bourbon can have no additional flavor components. That is why it is not a bourbon. Dickle adds vitamins to theirs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbyc Posted November 20, 2003 Share Posted November 20, 2003 Actually a good case used to be made that it was, Lincoln County process notwithstanding. The real reason it is not Bourbon, is because the BATF says it isn't. <font color="blue"> Good God Give John Mayer Some </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_in_Canada Posted November 20, 2003 Author Share Posted November 20, 2003 Jeff when you spell Dickel as Dickle, it makes me think of PICKLE juice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeff Posted November 20, 2003 Share Posted November 20, 2003 Jeff when you spell Dickel as Dickle, it makes me think of PICKLE juice. That would be an improvement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdelling Posted November 20, 2003 Share Posted November 20, 2003 >But I'd like to seriously ask the question: technically, isn't TN whiskey>a bourbon? I'm going to disagree with everyone.I hereby declare that Jack Daniels could legally be sold as a bourbon.I challenge anyone to find regulations otherwise.Go to http://www.access.gpo.gov/ecfr/ and look at Title 27, Volume 1, Chapter 1, Part 5.Jack Daniels meets all the requirements for "bourbon whiskey", and I canfind no reason to exclude it from this category.Tim Dellinger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_in_Canada Posted November 20, 2003 Author Share Posted November 20, 2003 Here's the full regulations. So long as the Lincoln process doesn't remove the percentages described in 5.27 ©© Any filtering or stabilizing process which results in a product which does not possess the taste, aroma, and characteristics generally attributed to that class or type of distilled spirits; and, in the case of straight whisky, results in the removal of more than 15 percent of the fixed acids, volatile acids, esters, soluble solids, or higher alcohols, or more than 25 percent of the soluble color;... then I would imagine that JD is a bourbon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeff Posted November 20, 2003 Share Posted November 20, 2003 While not a regulation, I did find This Article that seems to concure with my assertion. Lets dig deeper into this, I'm curious now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_in_Canada Posted November 20, 2003 Author Share Posted November 20, 2003 Hey Bobbby. I did some snooping on the BATF website and couldn't find anything against charcoal filtering. After all, most bourbon goes through some filtering (many use charcoal, irrespective of whether it is maple or not) but the TN process is pre-aging. I can't find anything here that disallows charcoal "mellowing". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeff Posted November 20, 2003 Share Posted November 20, 2003 According to This Article Tennessee Whiskey doesn't have to be made with corn, so long as it is made with 51% of some grain, though we all know that it is corn being used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeff Posted November 21, 2003 Share Posted November 21, 2003 I know this is very unscientific, but if you go to www.jackdaniels.com and take the online tour, one of the tour guides will tell you that it is the charcoal mellowing that makes JD a Tennesse whisky and not a bourbon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_in_Canada Posted November 21, 2003 Author Share Posted November 21, 2003 it is the charcoal mellowing that makes JD a Tennesse whisky and not a bourbon Jeff, they've been saying that all along, as part of their marketing pitch (along with any other TN distiller and the US government which gave them their own "appellation"). I'm just trying to find legal evidence that TN whiskey is NOT bourbon. But I think it might be a bourbon, but more specifically a TN whiskey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdelling Posted November 21, 2003 Share Posted November 21, 2003 >So long as the Lincoln process doesn't remove the percentages>described in 5.27 ©>...>then I would imagine that JD is a bourbon.If you look close at the language, I think the percents only applyto "straight" whiskey.Thus the percents would determine whether JD is a "straight bourbon whiskey"or merely a "bourbon whiskey".Looking at the other regulations:I'm supposing that charcoal treatment isn't considered "treatment with wood",so 5.39© doesn't apply.I still haven't decided whether JD's charcoal could be considered a"flavoring" under 5.23. That's a judgement call, and would be the onlyreason I can think of to disqualify JD from being a bourbon. If theprocess gives the whiskey an "ashy" taste, then it might be addingflavor.Tim Dellinger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ratcheer Posted November 21, 2003 Share Posted November 21, 2003 I agree with you, Tim. And I will add two points: 1) The Tennessee whisky makers are trying to set themselves apart from bourbon by not referring to their product as bourbon and, 2) I have seen products (legally) labeled as Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey that state that they are "charcoal filtered".A rose by any other name....If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck....Tim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ratcheer Posted November 21, 2003 Share Posted November 21, 2003 No, charcoal filtering does not add any flavoring. It removes impurities.Tim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MurphyDawg Posted November 21, 2003 Share Posted November 21, 2003 But havent we argued before that the sugar maple charcoal filetering BEFORE aging is a quick fix aginfg process. And wouldnt "aging" constitute adding flavor?? ALso I remember both BT & HH mentioning "neutralized or actualized" charcoal, ie specificall mentioning they make their charcoal not to taste. JD's marketing at least implies their charcoal does.TomC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeff Posted November 21, 2003 Share Posted November 21, 2003 Tim, I think the charcoal filtering that KY Straight bourbon Whiskies are refering to is activated charcoal, which AFAIK doesn't impart anything into the whiskey. Sugar Maple Charcoal, again AFAIK, adds a subtle flavor to the finished product. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeff Posted November 21, 2003 Share Posted November 21, 2003 Thus the percents would determine whether JD is a "straight bourbon whiskey"or merely a "bourbon whiskey". Is there such a thing as a "bourbon whiskey" that is not a "straight whiskey"? I thought bourbon was a step further down the process, therefore to be a bourbon, it must first be a straight whiskey. Am I mistaken? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbutler Posted November 21, 2003 Share Posted November 21, 2003 Here's an excerpt from the BATF liquor regulations. From section 5.22, this pertains to the identity of "whisky". The entire document has been available here for years. ((1)(iii) is the part you are after Jeff. Class 2; whisky. "Whisky" is an alcoholic distillate from a fermented mash of grain produced at less than 190° proof in such manner that the distillate possesses the taste, aroma, and characteristics generally attributed to whisky, stored in oak containers (except that corn whisky need not be so stored), and bottled at not less than 80° proof, and also includes mixtures of such distillates for which no specific standards of identity are prescribed. (1)(i) "Bourbon whisky", "rye whisky", "wheat whisky", "malt whisky", or "rye malt whisky" is whisky produced at not exceeding 160° proof from a fermented mash of not less than 51 percent corn, rye, wheat, malted barley, or malted rye grain, respectively, and stored at not more than 125° proof in charred new oak containers; and also includes mixtures of such whiskies of the same type. (ii) "Corn whisky" is whisky produced at not exceeding 160° proof from a fermented mash of not less than 80 percent corn grain, and if stored in oak containers stored at not more than 125° proof in used or uncharred new oak containers and not subjected in any manner to treatment with charred wood; and also includes mixtures of such whisky. (iii) Whiskies conforming to the standards prescribed in paragraphs ((1)(i) and (ii) of this section, which have been stored in the type of oak containers prescribed, for a period of 2 years or more shall be further designated as "straight"; for example, "straight bourbon whisky", "straight corn whisky", and whisky conforming to the standards prescribed in paragraph ((1)(i) of this section, except that it was produced from a fermented mash of less than 51 percent of any one type of grain, and stored for a period of 2 years or more in charred new oak containers shall be designated merely as "straight whisky". No other whiskies may be designated "straight". "Straight whisky" includes mixtures of straight whiskies of the same type produced in the same State. (2) "Whisky distilled from bourbon (rye, wheat, malt, or rye malt) mash" is whisky produced in the United States at not exceeding 160° proof from a fermented mash of not less than 51 percent corn, rye, wheat, malted barley, or malted rye grain, respectively, and stored in used oak containers; and also includes mixtures of such whiskies of the same type. Whisky conforming to the standard of identity for corn whisky must be designated corn whisky. (3) "Light whisky" is whisky produced in the United States at more than 160° proof, on or after January 26, 1968, and stored in used or uncharred new oak containers; and also includes mixtures of such whiskies. If "light whisky" is mixed with less than 20 percent of straight whisky on a proof gallon basis, the mixture shall be designated "blended light whisky" (light whisky--a blend). (4) "Blended whisky" (whisky--a blend) is a mixture which contains straight whisky or a blend of straight whiskies at not less than 20 percent on a proof gallon basis, excluding alcohol derived from added harmless coloring, flavoring or blending materials, and, separately, or in combination, whisky or neutral spirits. A blended whisky containing not less than 51 percent on a proof gallon basis of one of the types of straight whisky shall be further designated by that specific type of straight whisky; for example, "blended rye whisky" (rye whisky--a blend). (5) (i) "A blend of straight whiskies" (blended straight whiskies) is a mixture of straight whiskies which does not conform to the standard of identify for "straight whisky." Products so designated may contain harmless coloring, flavoring, or blending materials as set forth in 27 CFR 5.23(a). (ii) "A blend of straight whiskies" (blended straight whiskies) consisting entirely of one of the types of straight whisky, and not conforming to the standard for straight whisky, shall be further designated by that specific type of straight whisky; for example, "a blend of straight rye whiskies" (blended straight rye whiskies). "A blend of straight whiskies" consisting entirely of one of the types of straight whisky shall include straight whisky of the same type which was produced in the same State or by the same proprietor within the same State, provided that such whisky contains harmless coloring, flavoring, or blending materials as stated in 27 CFR 5.23(a). (iii) The harmless coloring, flavoring, or blending materials allowed under this section shall not include neutral spirits or alcohol in their original state. Neutral spirits or alcohol may only appear in a "blend of straight whiskies" or in a "blend of straight whiskies consisting entirely of one of the types of straight whisky" as a vehicle for recognized flavoring of blending material. (6) "Spirit whisky" is a mixture of neutral spirits and not less than 5 percent on a proof gallon basis of whisky, or straight whisky, or straight whisky and whisky, if the straight whisky component is less than 20 percent on a proof gallon basis. (7) "Scotch whisky" is whisky which is a distinctive product of Scotland, manufactured in Scotland in compliance with the laws of the United Kingdom regulating the manufacture of Scotch whisky for consumption in the United Kingdom: Provided, That if such product is a mixture of whiskies, such mixture is "blended Scotch whisky" (Scotch whisky--a blend). (8) "Irish whisky" is whisky which is a distinctive product of Ireland, manufactured either in the Republic of Ireland or in Northern Ireland, in compliance with their laws regulating the manufacture of Irish whisky for home consumption: Provided, That if such product is a mixture of whiskies, such mixture is "blended Irish whisky" (Irish whisky--a blend). (9) "Canadian whisky" is whisky which is a distinctive product of Canada, manufactured in Canada in compliance with the laws of Canada regulating the manufacture of Canadian whisky for consumption in Canada: Provided, That if such product is a mixture of whiskies, such mixture is "blended Canadian whisky" (Canadian whisky--a blend). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeff Posted November 21, 2003 Share Posted November 21, 2003 Thanks Jim, I guess I was mistaken. Hell, I guess I don't know my Tenneess whiskey very well Oh well, I can live with that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cornsqueezins Posted November 21, 2003 Share Posted November 21, 2003 I would have to agree with Jeff and say that the charcoal mellowing process introduces subtle flavoring elements. At least that's what my taste buds have been led to believe from JD ads and tour guides, etc. The power of suggestion may play into my impressions of JD but I'm pretty sure I've detected quite a bit of smokiness in certain bottles of JD before. I've automatically attributed that to the sugar maple charcoal without giving it much thought, but as we all know, barrel char level may account for some of that. One thing I'm absolutely sure about: Kentucky Bourbon folks don't want JD calling itself "bourbon". And the folks at JD are more than happy to oblige them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MurphyDawg Posted November 21, 2003 Share Posted November 21, 2003 activated charcoal THATS the word I was lookinf for, thanks Jeff!TomC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MurphyDawg Posted November 21, 2003 Share Posted November 21, 2003 They sell blended bourbon (sans the "straight" desegnation) around here, I think it is called Bourbon Deluxe. . . Also all the "Diluted Bourbon", like Old Dan Tucker, that we sell in Ohio supermarkets is non-straight-whiskey bourbon. Bleah on all of them.TomC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrel_Proof Posted November 22, 2003 Share Posted November 22, 2003 The leeching process -- at least as far as George Dickel goes -- also introduces the chewable flavors of Fred, Wilma, Barney, Betty, Pebbles, and Bam Bam. Mark and I detected, as have others, the presence of those unmistakable Bedrock flavors in Bob's bottle of No. 12 during our tasting this past weekend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbyc Posted November 23, 2003 Share Posted November 23, 2003 Cliff, Do they not also dissolve them in a acetone solution prior to introducing them to the leeching vat? <font color="brown"> Good God Give Jim Croce Some </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts