jsgorman Posted July 6, 2005 Share Posted July 6, 2005 I have the opportunity, to purchase a couple of bottles of EWSB 1989 from a store I just happened into. I'm wondering if these bottles are any more special than the current release. My benchmark Bourbons are the Blantons' Gold, 16 YO Hirsch and Stagg.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbyc Posted July 6, 2005 Share Posted July 6, 2005 Obviously the 1989 isn't being made any longer so you may see your only chance to get that year. The 1989 for no other reason would be a good year to have on hand for trade goods if you're so inclined. Beyond that, the current 1995 bottling is a fine drink. Looks like you're drinking some good pours, welcome on here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedmans Brorsa Posted July 6, 2005 Share Posted July 6, 2005 I´ve had the -88. It was good but no match for the -92 and -93 vintages which are the other ones I´ve tried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gr8erdane Posted July 6, 2005 Share Posted July 6, 2005 Hedmans, just wait til the 94 or 95 gets to you if you liked the 92 and 93. Too bad it takes so long to make it across the pond to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedmans Brorsa Posted July 7, 2005 Share Posted July 7, 2005 The -94 has actually been around for a long time. It´s just that I don´t recall reading anywhere that it is drastically different from its predecessors. I sometimes have to restrain myself from investing too much. You gotta have ample time to give a fair assessment to each and every bottle. Anyway, if you believe the -94 to be mandatory stuff then you have the opportunity now to persuade me. There are actually some pros with living in a control-obsessed country, the checking of availability of liquor being one. At the moment there are exactly 87 bottles of EWSB 94 spread throughout liquor stores in Sweden so there´s plenty to pick from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrbriggs Posted July 7, 2005 Share Posted July 7, 2005 Having tried the 93, 94 and 95, I will say that the 93 was by far my least favorite of the three, with too much harshness and char for my tastes. The 94 and 95 are close, with the 95 beating out the '94 by a hair. Both are wonderful, wonderful bourbons. I am not certain how they are priced outside the US, but over here they are one of the best deals around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts