gblick Posted February 19, 2014 Author Share Posted February 19, 2014 3 more Louisville bottles to add to the mix. The liter is stamped 00 and is not gold vein, the 750 of OWA is stamped 95 and is gold vein. The OWO is stamped '78 and is dual measurementNice addition, MT1. I'm guessing that the UPC on that 00 liter is 88004? Are there any etched/printed codes on that liter bottle? Before now, I have only ever seen one (maybe two) Louisville bottles of OWA with 00 on the bottom.I need to add some more bottles to this thread soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelturtle1 Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 Yes, 88004 on the liter and 88076 on the 95 750 the laser code on the 95 is 102042 there is some sort of laser code on the 00 but as it is printed in the indent on the bottom of the bottle it is totally unreadable Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelturtle1 Posted February 21, 2014 Share Posted February 21, 2014 added one more to the Louisville lineup today Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BourbonJoe Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 Loved lookin at those bottles guys.Joe :usflag: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelturtle1 Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 Added 3 more louisville bottles to the bunker the liter is a '95, the antique 750 is '96 and the owo is from '87. The UPC on the 90s bottles is 88076 and the owo is 88508. All the bottle codes are unreadable Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelturtle1 Posted April 2, 2014 Share Posted April 2, 2014 2 more for the pot one is a 4/5 (760ml export bottle) bottle stamp 76 and the other is a dual measurement with a '79 bottle stamp Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gblick Posted April 2, 2014 Author Share Posted April 2, 2014 Great finds, makes me want to get out there and hunt some more! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdman1099 Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 Here you go, Frank.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigerlam92 Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 Fantastic Scott! That may be the only second one I have seen of that label and the only one at that age and proof. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anex Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 Awesome Scott. Thanks for sharing. What year is that bottle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ejmharris Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 That is as beautiful bottle. Was that in your bunker or did you just obtain it? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Dusty Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 Here you go, Frank....Scott feel free to bring that to the next Indy gathering:cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smknjoe Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 Here are some that I have acquired recently. Already killed one of them to put it out of it's misery. All Louisville, UPC 88076, bottle date of 1994, and yummy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anex Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 Joe- those bottles are real slick! Nice pick-ups! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flahute Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 Dayum Joe!! Heck of a find. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gblick Posted April 11, 2014 Author Share Posted April 11, 2014 Very nice additions, folks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdman1099 Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 Awesome Scott. Thanks for sharing. What year is that bottle?I cant find a year on it, but ive been told late 50's early 60's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdman1099 Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 That is as beautiful bottle. Was that in your bunker or did you just obtain it? Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkIve had it for a while. Just pulled it out while reorganizing the closet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdman1099 Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 Scott feel free to bring that to the next Indy gathering:cool:as soon as its opened I'll do exactly that !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smknjoe Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 (edited) That's an awesome bottle Scott. Post some notes when you crack it open. Maybe I missed it, but do we know when the first post-prohibition bottles were produced and what the brand or label was called then? I think Scott has the oldest iteration of the label so far. And for that matter, what was the label like pre-prohibition? Edited April 11, 2014 by smknjoe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gblick Posted April 11, 2014 Author Share Posted April 11, 2014 It's interesting how Scott's very early bottle has the word Antique on it, then later they dropped Antique off of the label, and then later they again started putting Antique on the label. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelturtle1 Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 tasting 01-08 side by side.. You know for scientific purposes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smknjoe Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 Don't leave us hang'n... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelturtle1 Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 haha, I just started but there is a clear cut off. 01-05 are all nearly identical and 06-08 are identical.. The early bottles have a huge rich candied nose and cherries and chocolate come through on the palate. the 06-08 have a weird cardboard note mixed in with a bit of sweetness and then the palate just does not have as much punch or richness Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smknjoe Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 That's pretty much my experience with the dates. I found a stash of 05's last year that are really good. Dustyj was miffed that he missed them while hunting. :grin: I'll add that while you can tell a difference between the BT/Bernheim and S-W the early BT/Bernheim stuff is still very good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts